메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김한균 (한국형사법무정책연구원)
저널정보
한국형사판례연구회 형사판례연구 형사판례연구 제30권
발행연도
2022.7
수록면
155 - 192 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay aims to review the decison of the Supreme Court on the Crimes of abusing official authority. According to the article 123 of the Criminal Act, a public official who, by abusing his or her official authority, causes a person to perform the conduct which is not to be performed by the person, or obstructs the person from exercising a right which the person is entitled to exercise, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years, or fine not exceeding ten million Korean won. In the year of 2020, the Supreme Court ruled by its decision 2019do11698, that the director of Directorate of Public Prosecutors, Ministry of Justice, did not abused his offcial authority to causes the person under his command to make personnel decision against the victim of sexual assault by the very director, because the decision had not violated any principles or provisions on the personnel management of public prosecutors, and thus had not cause any person to perform the conduct which is not to be performed by the person. Such not positive decision on the criminality of the secondary victimization, or strict interpretation on the provision of he Crimes of abusing official authority does have a problem that did not consider what lies behind the improper but not-illegal personnel decision against the victim : the secondary victimization in the case of sexual violence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0