메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ahmed Abu-Zaid (Alfaisal University) Saeed Baradwan (Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center) Ehab Badghish (Maternity and Children Hospital Makkah) Rayan AlSghan (Maternity and Children Hospital AlKharj) Ahmed Ghazi (Jeddah University) Bayan Albouq (Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz National Guard Hospital) Khalid Khadawardi (Umm Al-Qura University) Nora F AlNaim (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cent) Latifa F AlNaim (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cente) Meshael Fodaneel (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center) Fatimah Shakir Abualsaud (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cent) Mohammed Ziad Jamjoom (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cente) Abdullah AMA Almubarki (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cente) Saud Owaimer Alsehaimi (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center) Safa Alabdrabalamir (Riyadh Second Health Cluster) Osama Alomar (Alfaisal University) Ismail A Al-Badawi (Alfaisal University) Hany Salem (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center)
저널정보
대한산부인과학회 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 제65권 제5호
발행연도
2022.9
수록면
406 - 419 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacyand safety of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) versus a control (placebo or no treatment) during hysterectomy forbenign conditions. Six databases were screened from inception to January 23, 2022. Eligible studies were assessed forrisk of bias. Outcomes were summarized as weighted mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervalsin a random-effects model. Five studies, comprising six arms and 911 patients were included in the study. Two andthree studies had an overall unclear and low risk of bias, respectively. Estimated intraoperative blood loss, requirementfor postoperative blood transfusion, and requirement for intraoperative topical hemostatic agents were significantlyreduced in a prophylactic TXA group when compared with a control group. Moreover, postoperative hemoglobinlevel was significantly higher in the prophylactic TXA group than in the control group. Conversely, the frequencyof self-limiting nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the prophylactic TXA group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of surgery duration, hospital stay, and diarrhearate. All the RCTs reported no incidence of major adverse events in either group, such as mortality, thromboembolicevents, visual disturbances, or seizures. There was no publication bias for any outcome, and leave-one-out sensitivityanalyses demonstrated stability of the findings. Among patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions,prophylactic TXA appeared largely safe and correlated with substantial reductions in estimated intraoperative bloodloss and related morbidities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0