메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유희철 (전북대학교) 양재도 (전북대학교병원)
저널정보
연세대학교 의과대학 Yonsei Medical Journal Yonsei Medical Journal 제62권 제2호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
172 - 176 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for thereduction of postoperative infection rate. Materials and Methods: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015and August 2017. A total of 509 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. This prospective study compared the resultsfor antibiotic group (AG) (n=249, cefotetan 1 g, 1 dose/prophylactic) and non-antibiotic group (NAG) (n=260). Results: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups: AG and NAG (p=0.580, 0.782, and0.325, respectively). Levels of C-reactive protein were higher in NAG compared to AG at postoperative day 2 (16.6±24.2 vs. 24.2±40.6; p=0.033). There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Fever≥38°C on postoperative day 2 occurred in 3 (1.2%) and 9 (3%) patients in AG and NAG, respectively. One patient in each grouphad subhepatic fluid collection by abdominal computed tomography, but there was no evidence of infection. Two patients inNAG (3%) had serous wound drainage on postoperative day 14. Conclusion: Our results showed no significant differences in patients receiving or not receiving prophylactic antibiotics duringLCC. Therefore, it is not necessary to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective LCC in patients who meet the inclusion criteria.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0