메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박해운 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2023년 봄호(통권 제142호)
발행연도
2023.2
수록면
277 - 315 (39page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2023.02.142.277

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In association with the issue for establishing the Japanese Empire, the scientific discourse for objectifying the Japanese Annexation of Korea in the Pre-WWII era was one of the most important issues to the Japanese intellectuals. Japanese thinkers, anthropologists and historians discussed various scientific and historical reasons to the colonial origin of the Koreans. Sekino Tadashi was not a thinker who joined in the ideological debates for creating the colonial view of history in Korea. As a scientific person who was an ideal type of the intellectual that the modern Japan required, his research method was based on direct observations and positive proof of the objects. However, his basic perspective to the Korean race was parallel with the biased view point that the Japanese intellectuals in the Meiji Japan period shared. In this context, Sekino approached cultural heritage in Korea with hypotheses for proving elements of Chinese culture in Korean cultural relics and the ancient Japanese domination in the southern Korean peninsula that the colonial government wanted to prove, and further what the people in the Japanese Empire wanted to believe.
Sekino’s inductive methodology contributed to more powerful foundations than other thinkers for objectifying the Japanese colonial domination in Korea, as he succeeded in eliminating debates on his approach to Korean cultural relics. By adopting the basic guideline of Korean archaeology and art history established by Sekio, which masks the biased view on the colonial past with the name of the scientific objectivism, Japanese scholars in colony Korea could insist that they conducted their research with objective ways. In this context, for the Imperial Japan, Sekino was a more suitable man for rationalizing its dominance to Korea than ideologists who brought about controversial issues.

목차

1. 서론
2. 1902년 세키노의 한국 조사 당시 시대적 배경
3. 세키노가 실시한 실증적인 한국 고적 조사의 효과
4. 한국인의 국민성과 예술의 상관관계에 대한 세키노 사고의 통시적 변화 과정
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-905-000452720