지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 227 - 253 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.46694/JSS.2022.9.37.3.227
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Middle voice is a construction that is difficult to define from the viewpoint of the voice as a dual system with passive and active constructions. Middle constructions are classified into several detailed semantic types. Among them, facilitative middles are the subject of this study. Facilitative middles in Russian mainly present the degree to which the object of the underlying transitive verb (promoted to the position of syntactic subject) is likely to be put into action. Therefore, the facilitative middles consist of a subject (the object of the underlying transitive verb), a present tense form of a reflexive verb derived from an imperfective transitive verb, and generic agent that is not explicitly expressed. In addition, many middle constructions combine with adverbial phrases of manner that indicate how an action is carried out.
This study examines the semantic and structural properties of facilitative middles in Russian, focusing on subject, verb, agent, and adverbial phrases, and analyzes the attributes of Russian facilitative middles through comparison with related constructions. The findings and conclusions are as follows.
First, the typical attributive meaning of facilitative middles is derived from the specific tense aspect form of the verb, namely the present imperfective verb form. Thus, when the verb tense is changed to the past, the possibility and potential of the action is weakened and when the aspect of the verb is changed to the perfective, the genericity and conventionality of the action disappear, consequently shifting to the interpretation of anticausative constructions.
Second, while generic agents cannot be specified and are only implied, non-generic agents can be specified through the “у” prepositional phrase. However, in this case, the cause of and responsibility for the action performed can be ascribed to the agent expressed through the prepositional phrase, not the subject; hence, the sentence obtains an interpretation similar to the passive.
Third, facilitative middles have modal meanings of potential and possibility in the sense that the object is likely to be subjected to an action. In particular, facilitative middles combine with various adverbial phrases with manner meanings.
Finally, there are the similar constructions that promote arguments other than the object of the underlying transitive verb as the subject. These are instrument-subject constructions and antipassive. These constructions are formed from a much narrower range of verbs than middle constructions. Therefore, the Russian middles are closely related to the passive, anticausative, antipassive, instrument-subject constructions and generalized personal constructions in accordance with the tense aspect form of verb, the genericity of the agent and the semantic role of the subject, among others.
This study examines the semantic and structural properties of facilitative middles in Russian, focusing on subject, verb, agent, and adverbial phrases, and analyzes the attributes of Russian facilitative middles through comparison with related constructions. The findings and conclusions are as follows.
First, the typical attributive meaning of facilitative middles is derived from the specific tense aspect form of the verb, namely the present imperfective verb form. Thus, when the verb tense is changed to the past, the possibility and potential of the action is weakened and when the aspect of the verb is changed to the perfective, the genericity and conventionality of the action disappear, consequently shifting to the interpretation of anticausative constructions.
Second, while generic agents cannot be specified and are only implied, non-generic agents can be specified through the “у” prepositional phrase. However, in this case, the cause of and responsibility for the action performed can be ascribed to the agent expressed through the prepositional phrase, not the subject; hence, the sentence obtains an interpretation similar to the passive.
Third, facilitative middles have modal meanings of potential and possibility in the sense that the object is likely to be subjected to an action. In particular, facilitative middles combine with various adverbial phrases with manner meanings.
Finally, there are the similar constructions that promote arguments other than the object of the underlying transitive verb as the subject. These are instrument-subject constructions and antipassive. These constructions are formed from a much narrower range of verbs than middle constructions. Therefore, the Russian middles are closely related to the passive, anticausative, antipassive, instrument-subject constructions and generalized personal constructions in accordance with the tense aspect form of verb, the genericity of the agent and the semantic role of the subject, among others.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중간문에 관한 선행연구
III. 러시아어 조력적 중간문의 특성과 범위
IV. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영어 중간태 동사 구문 : 영어 심리 동사를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2015 .04
-
한국어 중간동사의 형성과 특성에 관한 연구
현대영어영문학
2015 .01
-
On Middle Constructions in English: A Cognitive Grammar Perspective
새한영어영문학
2023 .02
-
러시아어 타동사의 논항 생략을 통한 디아테자의 변화
노어노문학
2022 .06
-
Verb selection in the Way-Construction
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
러시아어 타동사의 무보어 용법과 타동성 연구
유럽사회문화
2019 .01
-
러시아어 타동사의 자동사화에 대한 고찰: -SJA 재귀동사를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
What English Verb Errors do Korean University Students Make? A Corpus Examination of Learner-Produced Verb Phrases
영어학
2018 .12
-
Make 동사 의미에 대한 연구
언어과학연구
2019 .03
-
西周及春秋戰國時期的連動式
언어와 정보사회
2017 .01
-
『현대 한국어 동사 구문사전』 거시구조 기술의 문제
언어학
2016 .12
-
중간구문의 문제적 특성에 대한 성향론적 접근
언어과학
2015 .01
-
古代汉语动词划分研究 — 以《荀子》动词为例 —
중국학논총
2024 .03
-
중세국어 ‘-에/를’ 격 교체 구문에 관한 연구 -처격조사 ‘-에’와 대격조사 ‘-를’의 문법적 기능-
언어와 정보사회
2015 .03
-
“靠近”的词性词义探究
중국어문논역총간
2019 .07
-
현대/고대 프랑스어 운동동사(Vmt-Vinf) 구문에 대한 비교연구
언어과학
2015 .01
-
Two Different Types of Verb Phrase Fronting Constructions in Korean
어학연구
2022 .08
-
러시아어 반수동문의 범위와 분포에 대한 고찰
슬라브학보
2020 .09
-
“相等”詞性及相關問題新探
중국언어연구
2021 .08
-
한국어 문법론에서 중동태의 설정을 위하여
한말연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0