메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jungsoo Kim (Kyung Hee University) Sang-Hee Park (Duksung Women’s University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.22
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
675 - 694 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The relationship between a construction’s frequency of use and its acceptability is a complex issue (Featherston 2005, Lau et al. 2017). Researchers proposed that there is a tight connection between the corpus frequency and acceptability of pseudogapping, e.g., That music pleased Tim, but it didn’t me. Corpus studies found extremely high proportions of comparative conjunctions (as opposed to coordinate conjunctions like and and but) and pronominal subjects in the pseudogapped (PG)-clauses that are intended to co-refer with the subjects in the antecedent clauses (Hoeksema 2006, Levin 1980, Miller 2014). In this context, this study investigated the effects of (i) connective type (comparative or coordinate) and (ii) the pronominality of subjects in PG-clauses on acceptability ratings by native English speakers. Results showed that comparative pseudogapping received significantly higher ratings than coordinate pseudogapping, but the ratings for the latter were still in the acceptable range, i.e., around the median of a 7-point scale. Ratings on pronominal vs. proper name subjects in PG-clauses were more complicated than what previous studies suggested based on corpus findings and introspective judgments. In particular, a three-way difference was found between comparative, and-, and but-structures, showing that effects of subject pronominality crucially depend on the nature of the co-occurring connective. Overall, the present study provides experimental data for further research on ellipsis and offers a more fine-grained understanding of how different factors interact in the perception of pseudogapping sentences.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Frequency and Acceptability
3. Experiments
4. General Discussion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0