메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Can Middle Powers Coerce? : Behavioral Patterns in Intervention and Sanctions after Cold War
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Sangmin Lee (University of Rochester) Taehee Whang (Yonsei University)
Journal
The Korean Political Science Association Korean Political Science Review Vol.56 No.3 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2022.6
Pages
69 - 95 (27page)
DOI
10.18854/kpsr.2022.56.3.003

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Can Middle Powers Coerce? : Behavioral Patterns in Intervention and Sanctions after Cold War
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This study focuses on middle power’s patterns of behavior regarding coercive diplomacy in the aftermath of Cold War. Most literature of middle power theory suggests that middle power can be defined by its own unique behavior, and we expect to uncover such trait from middle power’s use of military intervention and economic sanctions as coercive diplomacy. From the realist view, middle power is simply a nation state with moderate power neither weak nor strong. On the other hand, from the liberal view, middle power is a diplomatic activist which vigorously participates in international organizations. We evaluate effects of each variable as a source of power to confidently engage in military intervention or economic sanctions through statistical analysis of logistic regression. We find that middle power is more likely to engage in military intervention than weak power, but not in economic sanctions. We also find that as a country participates in more international organizations, it is more likely to engage in both military intervention and economic sanctions. However, the interactive coefficient between two positively effective variables is negative, cancelling out each other’s effect in reality. Such result suggests the complex nature lying behind the middle power’s behavioral pattern regarding coercive diplomacy.

Contents

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Two approaches in international relations
Ⅲ. Introducing Middle Power
Ⅳ. Understanding Coercive Diplomacy
Ⅴ. Data
Ⅵ. Dependent Variables
Ⅶ. Explanatory Variables
Ⅷ. Method
Ⅸ. Data Analysis
Ⅹ. Conclusion
References
논문요약

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-340-001538204