메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김종준 (청주교육대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第253輯
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
263 - 294 (32page)
DOI
10.16912/tkhr.2022.03.253.263

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Numerous studies have recently defined fascism as “populist nationalism.” In a fascist system, modernization and tradition are simultaneously emphasized, and as subjects, they create one single unit, that of “the ethnic group.” The antipathy of the public toward liberalism and socialism is exploited here. In fact, Hitler perceived history as a means of promoting “national pride” based on his presentism. Therefore, “fascist historical perception” can be defined as “a historical perception that calls upon the traditions and history of the entire nation (state) to mobilize the public politically.” During colonial Joseon, how did the intellectuals accept such a historical view? Magazines such as Shin-Dong-A and Dong-gwang, along with intellectuals such as Lee Kwang-soo and Shin Dong-woo, saw that fascism could surpass the limits of Western modernity. Meanwhile, socialists rejected fascism as being a “capital advocacy movement” or questioned the notion of universality asserted by Japan, as did Seo In-sik and Park Chi-woo. When considering the path through which fascism is localized as a form of “totalitarianism,” it may be a process through which major elements of fascism (race, lineage, public support, etc.) are selectively emphasized or omitted. Concurrently, some socialists, including Kim Nam-cheon and Seo Kang-baek, criticized Ahn Jae-hong as a “Joseon-version fascist.” In fact, Ahn Jae-hong critically viewed fascism as a phenomenon that appears in the development of liberalism, and was concerned with saving nationalism from the accusation of “fascism.”

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이광수, 신흥우의 파시즘 옹호 논리
Ⅲ. 파시즘 비판론의 등장과 인식 구조
Ⅳ. 언론에 나타난 ‘파시즘적 역사인식’ 논쟁
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-905-001148192