지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper understands intangible cultural heritage as the effect of bureaucratic, legal and political interventions. Intangible cultural heritage does not simply exist－it is the result of valorization and valuation processes. Certain professional actors define what intangible cultural heritage is. Consequently, this excludes other forms of traditional or popular culture which are not marked, labelled and valorized as authorized intangible cultural heritage. The most powerful globally acting institution is UNESCO. And on national levels, nation states define intangible cultural heritage within national frames of reference. Hence, intangible cultural heritage is always linked to power, to logics of the market and to legal and political frames.
Arguing from the perspective of critical heritage studies, the paper understands intangible cultural heritage as a powerful political and bureaucratic resource. But what are the effects of globally acting heritage regimes which transform traditional or popular culture into a manageable good, a resource or cultural property?
From a cultural anthropological perspective, all cultural expressions which are labelled as authorized intangible cultural heritage by the nation state or UNESCO are dynamic and in constant change. However, heritage interventions often tend to freeze these cultural expressions, for example by installing national heritage inventories and lists. How can one discuss the tension between constant change(e.g. of performative practices like local customs or oral traditions) and the ways intangible heritage is safeguarded?
In accordance to U NESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage the paper conceptualizes heritage as an important tool to raise awareness for the value of popular and traditional culture, its diversity and its role in the context of intercultural dialogue. On the other hand, it discusses challenges that come with the instrumentalization of intangible cultural heritage, e.g. to manage and control ethnic minorities or vernacular culture in general.
Arguing from the perspective of critical heritage studies, the paper understands intangible cultural heritage as a powerful political and bureaucratic resource. But what are the effects of globally acting heritage regimes which transform traditional or popular culture into a manageable good, a resource or cultural property?
From a cultural anthropological perspective, all cultural expressions which are labelled as authorized intangible cultural heritage by the nation state or UNESCO are dynamic and in constant change. However, heritage interventions often tend to freeze these cultural expressions, for example by installing national heritage inventories and lists. How can one discuss the tension between constant change(e.g. of performative practices like local customs or oral traditions) and the ways intangible heritage is safeguarded?
In accordance to U NESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage the paper conceptualizes heritage as an important tool to raise awareness for the value of popular and traditional culture, its diversity and its role in the context of intercultural dialogue. On the other hand, it discusses challenges that come with the instrumentalization of intangible cultural heritage, e.g. to manage and control ethnic minorities or vernacular culture in general.
목차
Abstract
1. Intangible Heritage as a Bureaucratic and Political Project
2. Intangible Heritage as a Resource
3. Heritage Effects?
4. Intangible Cultural Heritage as Indicator of Social and Cultural Transformation Processes
References Cited
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
2000년대 이후 한국무형문화재정책의 전개과정
무형유산학
2023 .04
-
전승공동체 보호의 문제와 무형문화재법
무형유산학
2016 .04
-
전통음식 체험 프로그램을 통해 본 무형유산 관광의 방향성 연구 - 전주음식명가 김치 체험을 중심으로 -
무형유산학
2024 .04
-
일반5: 한국 무형문화재제도 변천사 연구: 국가무형문화재를 중심으로
음악과 현실
2016 .01
-
‘전통무용’ 분야 무형문화재 제도 현황과 쟁점
영남춤학회誌
2023 .04
-
무형문화재 전시 특성 분석에 관한 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2024 .04
-
무형문화유산과 무형문화재 유형별 분류체계에 관한 연구
무형유산학
2016 .04
-
동북아시아 전통무용의 의미 및 무형문화유산정책 고찰
한국체육과학회지
2018 .06
-
경기도 무형문화재 보호 조례 제정의 필요성과 방향
미술문화연구
2016 .06
-
2018 서울, 경기, 대전 지역 무형문화재 축제 특성 연구
한국무용연구
2019 .01
-
무형문화재 유형분류에 따른 전시기법 및 연출매체 분석에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .05
-
한국 전통복식분야의 문화재적 가치와 활용에 관한 연구
한복문화
2020 .12
-
생태예술(eco-art)을 통한 무형문화재춤 콘텐츠 연구
한국무용연구
2020 .01
-
평양랭면, 바게트, 보르쉬-유네스코 무형문화유산 목록에 등재된 음식 종목의 특징과 시사점
무형유산학
2023 .04
-
Regeneration of The Intangible Cultural Heritage of The Silk Road
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2018 .11
-
남한에서의 북한 지역기반 무형문화재 전승과 보존에 관한 제도 분석 연구
무용예술학연구
2021 .01
-
무형유산의 계승과 확산 방안 모색－전라남도를 중심으로－
무형유산학
2019 .04
-
무형유산에 대한 법인류학적 접근
무형유산학
2023 .11
-
태권도 유네스코 세계문화유산 등재에 대한 인식 조사
국기원태권도연구
2024 .06
-
동아시아 무형문화유산의 보호활동에 관한 비교연구
무형유산학
2020 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-600-000210119