메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
백승흠 (청주대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
469 - 497 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After being enacted in 2002, Product Liability Law has been enforced for 12 years until now without amendment. Though there have been few lawsuits which were brought an action for damages against manufacturer, a lot of cases happened actually. In connection with the plea of Development Risk, there is an debate on the level of manufacture’s scientific and technical knowledge. While the Product Liability Law based on manufacturer’s liability without fault, the Plea of Development Risk and the Liability without Fault is incompatible. In a leading cases on the level of scientific and technical knowledge, the court decided that “in order to have a defence under Article 7(e) of the Directive, the producer of a defective product must prove that the objective state of scientific and technical knowledge, including the most advanced level of such knowledge, at the time when the product in question was put into circulation was not such as to enable the existence of the defect to be discovered.” In this paper, the author described the EC Directives and the history of accepting the Plea of Development Risk in the Directives(Ⅱ), and then the application of the Plea of Development Risk in Korean Product Liability Law(Ⅲ). Finally, the author suggest that the Plea of Development Risk is no longer useful, because it is out of use owing to the court’s decision as stated above.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0