메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이희구 (중원대학교)
저널정보
한국고전중세르네상스영문학회 고전중세르네상스영문학 밀턴과 근세영문학 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
159 - 177 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We do not read Paradise Lost as an existential poem which is supposed to help us to engage in our pressing life problems. With the fall of Christianity and the rise of Modernist poetics, this biblical narrative in epic form degraded to one of texts in a classroom reading list or fragmented memes for pop culture. Most of Milton students approach this classic from scholarly interest without committing their life to the text. It is in the history of Milton criticism that C. S. Lewis occupies a unique position in that he not only wrote a criticism of Paradise Lost from historical approach (A Preface to Paradise Lost), but also remythified its criticism with his fictional creation of an SF novel (Perelandra). He, moreover, enacted the criticism in his life as his change of misogynist attitude exemplifies it. Lewis did not just historicize the target text, but walked into the time in which the text had been born and became an indigenous citizen of the age, while abolishing the modern myth of objective distance between a critic and his or her text. The last dinosaur or the last medieval man, as Lewis called himself, did not study Milton, but he met him and talked to him “in person.” And he returned to us with the story of his over-identification with the past, which in turn questions the validity of (new) historicism.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0