지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 135 - 171 (37page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The power of social movements depends on their autonomy to formulate agendas free from the control of powerful actors and challenge the status quo through sustained collective action. It was with this power of social movement that political challengers in South Korea were able to force authoritarian rulers to concede democracy and to expand democratic rights in the post-authoritarian period. However, the political relations between challengers and the government have shown significant change since the advent of the new millennium. At the core of this shift has been the institutionalization of co-governance, or hyeopchi, that celebrated cooperative partnership between government and civil society. An abundance of research has been done on co-governance with the intent of promoting this partnership from a public policy point of view. Critical analyses concerning how co-governance may have affected the ability of social movements to challenge existing power relations or the autonomous capacity of civil society have been conspicuous for their absence. This paper fills this lacuna by tracing the trajectory of the environmental movement with a focus on the introduction of co-governance mechanisms in the mid-2000s that significantly altered the political relationship between potential challengers and the powers that be. What emerges out of this analysis is a picture of the South Korean environmental movement that set out as an independent political movement gradually losing its autonomy and becoming part of the status quo. While co-governance may have expanded the scope of citizen participation and animated local communities, it has been inimical to the power of social movements to effect meaningful change.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
What is Going On? Co-governance and Social Movement Autonomy
The Trajectory of South Korea’s Environmental Movement: A Background
Changes in Government-EM Relations
Co-governance Dynamics and the Environmental Movement
Conclusion
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영어와 한국어의 공범주 현상 비교 분석
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 이동현상에 대한 연구
영어영문학
2018 .08
-
지역사회 지원환경은 사회적경제조직의 성과에 영향을 미치는가?: 네트워크와 협력거버넌스의 이중매개 효과를 중심으로
인문사회과학연구
2022 .08
-
한국 근대 정치ㆍ사회단체의 ‘국민’ 만들기 - 독립협회ㆍ대한자강회ㆍ대한협회ㆍ신간회를 중심으로 -
숭실사학
2017 .01
-
Democratization and the Role of Civil Society: Can S. Korea’s experience be replicated in today’s authoritarian country?
사회과학연구
2024 .04
-
‘지속적 위기’의 시대, 보호망 짓기의 새로운 방법으로서 ‘지방자치’의 가능성에 대한 정치철학적 제안
사회와 철학
2020 .10
-
오사운동 시기 孫文集團의 민권정치론
중국근현대사연구
2022 .12
-
What’s Different about Corporate Governance in Korea and Eurasia?
슬라브硏究
2018 .01
-
Political Consumerism as Political Participation in Korea: The Influence of Anti-Business Sentiments, Political Ideology, and Social Media
Korea Observer
2021 .12
-
When can Topics be Questioned?
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
HISTORY TEACHER’S REVIEW: WHAT DOES THE MARCH 1ST INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT OF 1919 MEAN TO US?
Public History & Museum
2019 .12
-
The Civic Movement in South Korea: Its Growth and Change
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2015 .06
-
인공지능 거버넌스로서의 소셜머신: 구성적 정보 철학 관점에서
영어권문화연구
2019 .01
-
[On This Topic] The Paradox of the Social Movement Society
Korea Journal
2021 .12
-
주제화·wh-이동과 어순섞기 현상에서의 비대칭성
신영어영문학
2017 .11
-
협치의 이상과 자치의 딜레마: 홍성통의 지역 거버넌스 분석
비교문화연구
2019 .12
-
현대 패션 윈도우 디스플레이에 나타난 키네티시즘 움직임 특성
복식문화연구
2018 .01
-
Comply or Explain 방식의 기업지배구조 공시와 기업가치 -핵심지표를 중심으로-
유라시아연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-911-000037583