지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국일본어학회 일본어학연구 일본어학연구 제70집
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 145 - 165 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.14817/jlak.2021.70.145
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
2022
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study I explored the change of the Alveolar plosive initials and Alveolar sibilant affricate & fricative initials form Old Chinese to Middle Chinese. Findings can be summarized in the following five points.
1. There were two language groups in Old Chinese. The first group distinguished aspirated and tenuis initials. We call it Language “A”. The second group distinguished voiced and voiceless sounds, We call it Language “B”. It is thought that in Old Chinese, Language “A” was more influential than “B”. “A” was distributed widely in the north whereas “B” was in the south. Middle Chinese distinguished not only aspirated and tenuis sounds but also voiced and voiceless sounds, which was produced after the language contact between “A” and “B”.
2. Alveolar plosive initials and Alveolar sibilant affricate & fricative initials existed separately in Old Chinese. Postalveolar plosive initials and Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese were derived from Alveolar plosive initials in Old Chinese and Postalveolar affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese were derived from Alveolar sibilant affricate & fricative initials in Old Chinese. The Cr-type consonant cluster was basically possible in Old Chinese. Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese had two different sources form Old Chinese. One was form Tri-type, which we call Group “α” and the other one was from Ti-type, which we call Group “β”. After the disappearance of [r] of Group “α”, Group “α” and Group “β” underwent the palatalization during Northern and Southern Dynasties, and merged to Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials.
3. The separation of Postalveolar plosive initials from Alveolar plosive initials happened in some areas of the Western Jin Dynasty. However, the separation had not occurred in some areas in the Northern and Southern Dynasties.
4. In Old Chinese, people who used Language “B” did not distinguish between Alveolar fricative and Sibilant affricate consonants.
5. Tongue-up sounds and Tooth-up sounds were Postalveolar initials in the Qie-yun system.
1. There were two language groups in Old Chinese. The first group distinguished aspirated and tenuis initials. We call it Language “A”. The second group distinguished voiced and voiceless sounds, We call it Language “B”. It is thought that in Old Chinese, Language “A” was more influential than “B”. “A” was distributed widely in the north whereas “B” was in the south. Middle Chinese distinguished not only aspirated and tenuis sounds but also voiced and voiceless sounds, which was produced after the language contact between “A” and “B”.
2. Alveolar plosive initials and Alveolar sibilant affricate & fricative initials existed separately in Old Chinese. Postalveolar plosive initials and Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese were derived from Alveolar plosive initials in Old Chinese and Postalveolar affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese were derived from Alveolar sibilant affricate & fricative initials in Old Chinese. The Cr-type consonant cluster was basically possible in Old Chinese. Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials in Middle Chinese had two different sources form Old Chinese. One was form Tri-type, which we call Group “α” and the other one was from Ti-type, which we call Group “β”. After the disappearance of [r] of Group “α”, Group “α” and Group “β” underwent the palatalization during Northern and Southern Dynasties, and merged to Alveolo-palatal affricate & fricative initials.
3. The separation of Postalveolar plosive initials from Alveolar plosive initials happened in some areas of the Western Jin Dynasty. However, the separation had not occurred in some areas in the Northern and Southern Dynasties.
4. In Old Chinese, people who used Language “B” did not distinguish between Alveolar fricative and Sibilant affricate consonants.
5. Tongue-up sounds and Tooth-up sounds were Postalveolar initials in the Qie-yun system.
목차
Abstract
1. 序論
2. 本論
3. 結論
參考文獻
要旨
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
비자연언어접촉과 성조제약 연구: 漢·韓 언어접촉을 예로
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2020 .08
-
촉의 생성 및 작용
동서철학연구
2023 .06
-
수산물 명칭 속에 나타난 잔존일본어에 관한 연구
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
唐代 長安音을 중심으로 한 非自然接觸의 親緣關係 연구 : 한국 한자음과 베트남 한자음을 예로
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .04
-
1711년 신묘사행 응대를 위한 일본의 준비 양상
동양한문학연구
2021 .01
-
변행심소 촉(觸)에 대한 규기의 해석
불교학연구
2015 .01
-
韓中 言語接觸의 觀點에서 본 韓國 漢字文
어문연구(語文硏究)
2018 .01
-
유식론에서의 식의 존재와 초기불교 수행체계에서의 식의 구현
동아시아불교문화
2017 .01
-
변행심소 촉에 대한 후카우라 세이분의 해석
불교학보
2015 .12
-
오후레가키(御觸書)를 통해 본 일본의 通信使 접대
서강인문논총
2015 .12
-
新聞의 時代와 新小說 - 新小說에 나타난 ‘新聞/記事’의 樣相과 그 意味 -
어문연구(語文硏究)
2019 .01
-
蓮軒 李宜茂의 한시 연구
동양고전연구
2022 .12
-
영역과 정의의 관점에서 보는 번뇌의 심리학
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
니까야 Majjha의 이해와 초기불교 수행체계에서의 Majjha의 구현 -아나빠나 사띠에서의 majjha의 닦음과 알음알이에 대한 고찰을 중심으로
불교학연구
2017 .01
-
구원론적 관점에서 본 불교미학: 빨리 성전과 그 주석서들을 중심으로
불교학연구
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0