메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이광태 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제36권 제3호
발행연도
2021.9
수록면
79 - 102 (24page)
DOI
10.46694/JSS.2021.09.36.3.79

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since its independence in 1991, the Republic of Uzbekistan has maintained the program of building its own national identity, in which writing histories on the Uzbek land and people has played a crucial role. There have been a number of historical works produced by Uzbek scholars, several of whom were directly commissioned or sponsored by the government. Through the analysis of those works, some tendencies of viewpoints in Uzbekistan’s official or semi-official historical writings have been revealed, such as the upholding of prominent historical figures as national heroes and the vilifying of the Soviet past. Nevertheless, the legacy from the Soviet historiography remains influential particularly in the negative judgment of the period of the Uzbek dynasties in the 18th-19th centuries.
This paper illustrates how Uzbekistan’s scholars have made efforts to overcome the biases derived from the Soviet historical ideology and methodology that described the rulers of the Uzbek dynasties as “oriental despots” and portrayed the period as that of decline before the Russian expansion into Central Asia. Partly inspired by the Western scholars’ call for research on new historical sources, the recent Uzbek scholarship agree to the necessity of reevaluating the historical developments in 18th-19th century Central Asia. Surprisingly, the reverence of Amir Timur as the greatest Uzbek hero, which the present Uzbekistan government is committed to promote, in effect originated from the political transformation in that period. The pursuit of non-Chinggisid authority by the so-called “tribal dynasties” of Bukhara, Khiva, and Khoqand along with Central Asian people’s aspiration for social stability created the idealization of Amir Timur, which was firmly established during the 19th century. Therefore, the study of the Uzbek society in the 18th-19th centuries, which has thus far been ignored, is of great relevance for understanding the legitimization of the present leadership of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 우즈베키스탄의 정체성 형성 과정에서 역사 서술의 특징
Ⅲ. 18-19세기 우즈베크 왕조에 대한 우즈베키스탄 역사 서술 특징
Ⅳ. 아미르 티무르 민족영웅화의 기원
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (63)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0