지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.3
- 수록면
- 39 - 80 (42page)
- DOI
- 10.69596/JLL.2021.03.77.39
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In a critical situation where failure to receive a bailout from the IMF would result in a state bankruptcy, the Tripartite Commission, which was launched on 15 January 1998, made a dramatic agreement to share the pain through a breathtaking dialogue over a short period of 20 days. On February 6, labor, management and government reached the agreement to allow basic labor rights of government employees and teachers, guarantee the union’s political activities, and legislate the employment adjustment and dispatch system. On February 9, labor, management and government signed social agreement to overcome the economic crisis.
The legislation on the contents of the social agreement was realized through the revision of the Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, the Labor Standards Act, the Act on Protection of Dispatched Workers, and the Special Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Council of Government Employees. Looking at the legislative process, four characteristics and implications can be derived. ① The contents of the bill may vary depending on the capacities of individual lawmakers. ② Like the capacities of individual lawmakers, the capacities of the government, such as the minister, have a great influence on the legislative process. ③ If compromise is needed, it is more effective to agree on a new bill than a side comment. ④ The legislation and judiciary committee review process needs to be closely examined.
In addition, comparing the legislative process of the 1st Tripartite Commission agreement in 1998 with the legislative process of the flexible worktime system in 2020: ①The time interval between the agreement and legislation is different, ② the proposers of the legislation are different, ③ The members of the National Assembly are competing for legislation, ④ the role of expert committee members was reinforced, and ⑤ the legislative party bonds were strengthened.
Among the changes in the legislative environment, a prominent phenomenon in the legislation of the labor law is the reinforcement of party binding. It can be understood that the characteristics of the labor law, in which the interests between labor and management are sharply opposed, appeared in the National Assembly in the form of reinforcing party bonds. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a practice of respecting the consensus in the National Assembly and seek a model in which party members also participate in the consensus process. In addition, it is hoped that the government, the consensus subject, will take responsibility for legislation, submit the bill and actively persuade the lawmakers, thereby enabling faster legislative action.
The legislation on the contents of the social agreement was realized through the revision of the Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, the Labor Standards Act, the Act on Protection of Dispatched Workers, and the Special Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Council of Government Employees. Looking at the legislative process, four characteristics and implications can be derived. ① The contents of the bill may vary depending on the capacities of individual lawmakers. ② Like the capacities of individual lawmakers, the capacities of the government, such as the minister, have a great influence on the legislative process. ③ If compromise is needed, it is more effective to agree on a new bill than a side comment. ④ The legislation and judiciary committee review process needs to be closely examined.
In addition, comparing the legislative process of the 1st Tripartite Commission agreement in 1998 with the legislative process of the flexible worktime system in 2020: ①The time interval between the agreement and legislation is different, ② the proposers of the legislation are different, ③ The members of the National Assembly are competing for legislation, ④ the role of expert committee members was reinforced, and ⑤ the legislative party bonds were strengthened.
Among the changes in the legislative environment, a prominent phenomenon in the legislation of the labor law is the reinforcement of party binding. It can be understood that the characteristics of the labor law, in which the interests between labor and management are sharply opposed, appeared in the National Assembly in the form of reinforcing party bonds. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a practice of respecting the consensus in the National Assembly and seek a model in which party members also participate in the consensus process. In addition, it is hoped that the government, the consensus subject, will take responsibility for legislation, submit the bill and actively persuade the lawmakers, thereby enabling faster legislative action.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 2. 6. 노사정 대타협
Ⅲ. 노동법률의 입법과정
Ⅳ. 탄력근로제 입법과정과의 비교
Ⅴ. 맺음말을 대신하여 입법환경의 변화와 노동입법의 과제
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미군정기 노동법에 관한 연구
노동법학
2025 .03
-
21대 국회 노동입법에 대한 평가와 과제
사회법연구
2024 .08
-
9.15 노사정합의와 노동법 개정안 검토 : 기단법 및 근기법을 중심으로
노동법학
2015 .12
-
입법평가제도의 발전과 입법평가기준에 관한 비교법적 연구
비교법연구
2022 .12
-
새 정부의 노동정책과 법제도의 개선 과제
노동법학
2022 .06
-
급증하는 의원입법안, 어떻게 할 것인가?
입법학연구
2024 .08
-
의원입법의 동인 -19대 국회 과학기술 분야 상임위원회의 입법생산성을 중심으로
의정논총
2017 .01
-
‘좋은 법률’을 통한 헌법가치 및 공익실현 방안에 관한 연구
비교법연구
2022 .08
-
입법과정의 개선을 통한 ‘최적화 법률’의 달성방안 연구
법이론실무연구
2022 .11
-
입법형식과 입법평가
공법연구
2016 .12
-
노동시장정책과 쟁점 검토
노동법논총
2015 .08
-
20대 국회 정보통신 입법 동향 분석- 입법학적 비판의 맥락에서 -
연세법학
2020 .01
-
플랫폼노동의 쟁점과 향후 입법 · 정책적 과제
노동법포럼
2020 .02
-
중국 2015년 ‘입법법’ 개정의 쟁점 연구 - ‘법치’ 개혁의 관점에서 -
중국법연구
2016 .01
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
입법교육의 지형과 대안
유럽헌법연구
2022 .04
-
1953년 근로기준법의 노동정책적 의의
경희법학
2017 .01
-
입법영향분석제도 및 사례 분석을 통한 새로운 방법론 구상
입법과 정책
2024 .04
-
국회의 입법과정에 대한 개선 방안 연구
홍익법학
2019 .01
-
연장근로시간 기준단위의 변경에 대한 정부 입법예고안의 타당성 검토 — 프랑스 근로시간제와 비교를 중심으로 —
노동법포럼
2023 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-336-001578740