메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박성현 (광운대학교)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제88호
발행연도
2020.12
수록면
277 - 337 (61page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper actively agrees with Dahl(1985)’s position that it is possible to obtain a primary and prototypical meaning among various meanings of tense and aspect expressions by looking at the context in which they are used. I tried to find the basic meaning of the tense-aspect expressions in Korean language using the research methodology of Dahl(1985), TMA questionnaire. As a result of conducting a survey of 11 native Korean speakers using the TMA questionnaire translated into Korean, the following conclusions were obtained. In Korean, only the tense category is used as the centre category, and the aspect category and the perfect category are periphery categories, and the use of the aspect and perfect category is contained within the use area of the tense category expression. If the periphery category is used in a context where both the centre category and the periphery category can be used, the meaning of the centre category is realized with the meaning of the aspect and the perfect categories. In other words, the tense category expressions ‘∅, -ㄴ/는(present)’, ‘-었-(past)’ and ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이-(future)’ are time references for each tense area and perform the function of expressing the aspect and perfect meaning within each tense domain. ‘-었-’ has the meaning of perfective(PFV) when it comes to the context in which imperfective(IPFV) ‘-더-’ appears. And it has the meaning of perfect(PFCT) when it comes to the context in which complex perfect(PLUPFCT) ‘-었었-’ appears. ‘-었었-’ and ‘-었-’ can be distinguished in the concept of distance in time and ‘-었-’can be seen as being in charge of ‘perfect(PFCT)’ by having recency. And the aspect category expression ‘-고 있-’ expresses ‘progression(PROG)’ and ‘imperfective(IPFV)’ without tense restrictions.

목차

1. 서론
2. 국어의 시제-상-서법 체계
3. Dahl(1985)의 범언어적 시제-서법-상 체계
4. 한국어 TMA 설문지 조사
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0