지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국중어중문학회 중어중문학 中語中文學 第81輯
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 95 - 124 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.46612/kjcll.2020.09.81.95
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Kaishu style, “人 rén” is transformed to “儿 rén” when it is located below another character. This varied form “儿 rén” is often written as “几 jī” when it is not attached to the part right above it. For this reason, the Chinese characters containing “儿 rén” that is not in contact with the upper part, such as “虎 hǔ”, “微 wēi”, “禿 tū”, “宂 rǒng”, “亮 liàng” and “兜 dōu”, often have a variant form in which “儿 rén” is transformed to “几 jī”.
There are not a few inconsistencies of the forms of components in Chinese character fonts currently used in Korea; more seriously, even the same character has slightly different forms depending on the font. These inconsistencies have been an obstacle that hinders Chinese character education. The same problem is found in the characters that contain “儿 rén”. Therefore, this paper closely examined how neighboring countries in the Chinese character cultural sphere handled this issue for the establishment of standard Chinese character forms. In addition, this paper presents two suggestions that can serve as a reference in dealing with this issue in the process of revising domestic Chinese fonts based on the examples of other East Asian countries. First, based on Shuowenjiezi, for the characters containing “人 rén” in Xiaozhuan style, the forms with “儿 rén” are regarded as a standard in Kaishu style as well. Second, in consideration of the findings of Chinese grammatological studies and the tradition of Kaishu style in actual calligraphic practice, the forms with “几 jī” are regarded as a standard except for “宂 rǒng”, “呪 zhòu” and other characters that have been clearly known to include “儿 rén” for etymological reasons.
The most important point is, whichever of the two is adopted, to improve the systemicity and regularity in the structure of Chinese characters by unifying the different component forms to a fullest extent. As the current issue, that the forms of the same component change slightly depending on the character or the forms of characters vary depending on the font, has a very negative effect on Chinese character education, an improvement is urgently needed.
There are not a few inconsistencies of the forms of components in Chinese character fonts currently used in Korea; more seriously, even the same character has slightly different forms depending on the font. These inconsistencies have been an obstacle that hinders Chinese character education. The same problem is found in the characters that contain “儿 rén”. Therefore, this paper closely examined how neighboring countries in the Chinese character cultural sphere handled this issue for the establishment of standard Chinese character forms. In addition, this paper presents two suggestions that can serve as a reference in dealing with this issue in the process of revising domestic Chinese fonts based on the examples of other East Asian countries. First, based on Shuowenjiezi, for the characters containing “人 rén” in Xiaozhuan style, the forms with “儿 rén” are regarded as a standard in Kaishu style as well. Second, in consideration of the findings of Chinese grammatological studies and the tradition of Kaishu style in actual calligraphic practice, the forms with “几 jī” are regarded as a standard except for “宂 rǒng”, “呪 zhòu” and other characters that have been clearly known to include “儿 rén” for etymological reasons.
The most important point is, whichever of the two is adopted, to improve the systemicity and regularity in the structure of Chinese characters by unifying the different component forms to a fullest extent. As the current issue, that the forms of the same component change slightly depending on the character or the forms of characters vary depending on the font, has a very negative effect on Chinese character education, an improvement is urgently needed.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 국내 글꼴의 문제점 및 한자문화권 지역의 표준 한자체 검토
3. 고대한자 자료를 통한 字源탐색 및 隸楷書의 역대 서법 綜覽
4. 본고 건의안
5. 나가는 말
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 컴퓨터용 폰트 자형의 偏旁 형체 불일치 현상 및 그 修整에 대한 提言
중국언어연구
2023 .04
-
彦聲系字와 㕣聲系字의 자형 표준화에 대한 提言
중국문학연구
2019 .01
-
한자 수준 설정을 위한 기초 연구－아이트래커를 활용한 학습자의 한자 인지 특성 파악
漢文敎育論集
2017 .01
-
초등학교 한자교육의 학습 효과에 대한 연구 현황과 과제
漢字漢文敎育
2017 .01
-
미래 교육과정과 한자 교육의 지향
漢文敎育論集
2019 .01
-
중국의 디지털 기술을 활용한 漢字 敎育
漢文敎育論集
2022 .06
-
‘인명용 한자’ 자형 및 자음 표준화 방안 연구
동방한문학
2018 .01
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
說文解字 部首의 字體變遷 硏究 -小篆에서 楷書로의 변이자소를 중심으로-
漢字漢文敎育
2015 .01
-
漢字敎育이 靑少年에 미치는 影響 考察
한국사상과 문화
2017 .01
-
중국 인명용자 규범의 변화 양상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
교육용 한자 학습 방법의 비판적 검토
우리말연구
2019 .01
-
‘한문교육용 기초한자’ 표준 字形 제정에 관한 연구
漢文敎育論集
2015 .01
-
4차 산업혁명 시대 학교 밖漢字․漢文 교육의 실태와 방향
漢文敎育論集
2022 .06
-
‘漢字의 形･音･義’ 파악하기 敎授･學習 方法
漢字漢文敎育
2017 .01
-
『通用规范汉字表』의 의의와 한계
중국학
2017 .01
-
한국어 어휘 교육에서 한자어 조어 지식의 활용과 한자 교육의 문제
언어사실과 관점
2023 .02
-
교육용 기초 한자에 대한 검토와 제안
중국어문학지
2020 .01
-
대학 교양 한자(어) 교과목의 효율적 운영 방안 모색 - 서울대학교 〈한국의 한자와 한자어〉 수업 사례를 중심으로
한국학논집
2023 .09
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-820-001315439