메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국로지스틱스학회 로지스틱스연구 로지스틱스연구 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
1 - 11 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Pooling works when the needs of the participants are independent or exclusive. Those who remain in demand can fill those who lack. However, this study began by wondering what would happen if participants had opportunism in this pooling process. The hypothesis is that the opportunism of the participants reduces the pooling effect. Experiment and simulation were combined to test this hypothesis. The experiment confirmed that the subject had opportunism in the pooling situation. And the simulation confirmed the impact on pooling. After the morning sale was completed, the experiment subjects received help for afternoon sale by pooling. When pooling, the order quantity was checked for distortion in order to receive more. It is expected that phantom orders will increase when receiving an additional supply rather than a return. And the experiment was to see how much occurs. The overall pooling effect was measured by implanting the decision function found in the experiment into the simulation model. Pooling consists of one seller and two buyers. The effect is quantified by simulating the case that one buyer has opportunism and non-opportunism.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0