메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제언어인문학회 인문언어 인문언어 제21권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
33 - 62 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to briefly differentiate views on war as represented in Western Literature and Philosophy. War was revered in Western Philosophy as “naturally rational and sublime”(Kant), “ethical and necessary”(Hegel), and “instinctive and naturally recurrent”(Nietzsche), to name a few Western philosophers. But Western literature, especially that of World War I expressing each individual’s pain and suffering in its concrete form, has begun to stand apart from the religious and philosophical tradition of “sacred war” or “just war” in the Hobbesian world of “homo homini lupus.” Herein lies the dichotomy of pro-war philosophy vs. anti-war literature, a bit oversimplified and hackneyed topos dating from Plato’s denigration of myth and literature. Literature has not always been anti-war, nor has philosophy always been pro-war. Besides, such a dichotomy is no longer tenable in the 21st century when nuclear warfare implies total annihilation of mankind. Total abnegation of “the other” through nuclear war is in effect the total annihilation of “the self,” thus nuclear war nullifies the concept of war itself. The rise and spread of civilization through war’s side effects, such as scientific discovery and technological development, comes to an end with nuclear war, especially when civilization turns out to be barbarity itself, if we follow Walter Benjamin

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0