지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Tuyuhun was founded by Xianbei(鮮卑) in the middle of the 4th century by moving to the current area of south of Gansu(甘肅) and Qinghai(靑海). They prospered through transit trade. Tibet"s attack destroyed the Tuyuhun state in the third year of Longshuo period(663). Tuyuhun-Kehan(吐谷渾 可汗) Murong Nuohebo(慕容諾曷鉢) and the princess of the Tang Dynasty Honghua(弘化公主) led thousands-tribes Tuyuhun population to be evacuated to Tang Liangzhou. Tuyuhun"s refugees then evacuated to the nearby area of Tang Dynasty to avoid the Tibet attack.
Tang Dynasty made Tuyuhun"s refugees(吐谷渾 遺民) migrate to his territory depending on the situations. During the period of Shengli(聖曆, 698∼700),because of the purge of the Prime Minister Lun Qinling(論欽陵) in Tibet, a large number of Tuyuhun"s refugees under the rule of Tibet were evacuated to Tang Dynasty. At April the second year of Shengli period(699), Lun Gongren(論弓仁), son of lunqinling took 7,000-tribes Tuyuhun population and took refuge in Tang Dynasty. In July of that year, the 1400-tribes Tuyuhan population again took refuge in Tang Dynasty. After than, many Tuyuhun"s refugees have been evacuated to Liangzhou(涼州), Ganzhou(甘州), Suzhou(肅州), Guazhou(瓜州) and Shazhou(沙州) et al. The documents unearthed from tomb 225, Astana, Turpan says that 100,000 people under Tuyuhun-Kehan, who were under the control of Tibet before February 701, will flee to Tang Dynasty. These two records are identical in terms of location and time of evacuation.
Thus, the Tang government discussed where and how to migrate them. The migration plan claimed by Guo Yuanzhen(郭元振) is as follows. First, it should be moved in consideration of the betrayal of Tuyuhun"s refugees. Second, they should be moved to the frontiers of Liangzhou, Ganzhou, Suzhou, Guazhou, and Shazhou, not Central Plains. Third, the refugees should be dispersed and relocated instead of being in one place. Fourth, control them by selecting each intelligent government official in the area. Furthermore, the government should send special envoy, who knows situation in other ethernet groups and calculation of benefit well. Tang Dynasty moved and controlled Tuyuhun"s refugees, which had been evacuated through the traditional “Jimi(羈縻)” method. This was to prevent Tuyuhun"s refugees from betraying and leaving Tang Dynasty.
Tang Dynasty made Tuyuhun"s refugees(吐谷渾 遺民) migrate to his territory depending on the situations. During the period of Shengli(聖曆, 698∼700),because of the purge of the Prime Minister Lun Qinling(論欽陵) in Tibet, a large number of Tuyuhun"s refugees under the rule of Tibet were evacuated to Tang Dynasty. At April the second year of Shengli period(699), Lun Gongren(論弓仁), son of lunqinling took 7,000-tribes Tuyuhun population and took refuge in Tang Dynasty. In July of that year, the 1400-tribes Tuyuhan population again took refuge in Tang Dynasty. After than, many Tuyuhun"s refugees have been evacuated to Liangzhou(涼州), Ganzhou(甘州), Suzhou(肅州), Guazhou(瓜州) and Shazhou(沙州) et al. The documents unearthed from tomb 225, Astana, Turpan says that 100,000 people under Tuyuhun-Kehan, who were under the control of Tibet before February 701, will flee to Tang Dynasty. These two records are identical in terms of location and time of evacuation.
Thus, the Tang government discussed where and how to migrate them. The migration plan claimed by Guo Yuanzhen(郭元振) is as follows. First, it should be moved in consideration of the betrayal of Tuyuhun"s refugees. Second, they should be moved to the frontiers of Liangzhou, Ganzhou, Suzhou, Guazhou, and Shazhou, not Central Plains. Third, the refugees should be dispersed and relocated instead of being in one place. Fourth, control them by selecting each intelligent government official in the area. Furthermore, the government should send special envoy, who knows situation in other ethernet groups and calculation of benefit well. Tang Dynasty moved and controlled Tuyuhun"s refugees, which had been evacuated through the traditional “Jimi(羈縻)” method. This was to prevent Tuyuhun"s refugees from betraying and leaving Tang Dynasty.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 699∼700년 경 토욕혼 유민의 내부와 河西 안치
Ⅲ. 701년 郭元振의 토욕혼 유민 安置論과 그 결말
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
포스트 코로나 시대의 하곡사상 - 생리(生理)와 감통(感通)을 중심으로 -
양명학
2020 .12
-
7世紀初 唐의 對外戰爭 名分과 國際秩序
중국고중세사연구
2016 .02
-
일본 사소설과 매독 - 이와노 호메이의 『탐닉』을 중심으로-
일본어문학
2018 .01
-
唐代 行軍 운영의 변화와 節度使의 출현
중국고중세사연구
2023 .08
-
7세기 왜국의 外征과 內戰의 ‘戰後처리’와 일본의 탄생
日本思想
2017 .01
-
한국 내 무슬림 난민의 현황, 난민제도의 이해 및 한국 기독교 교회의 과제
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2016 .03
-
To Make Live : Representing and Protesting Refugee Agency
Localities
2016 .11
-
일본 난민정책과 국익의 연계
일본연구
2017 .01
-
동북아 난민문제의 정치외교적 대응격차
담론201
2019 .01
-
지구촌과 난민 : 한국사회와 교회의 역할
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2019 .03
-
조선 현종~숙종 연간 기후 재난의 여파와 유민(流民) 대책의 변화
역사와현실
2020 .12
-
도성 관련 용어 검토 — ‘都’ㆍ‘郭’ㆍ‘京’을 중심으로 —
사림
2017 .01
-
도래하지 않을 미래를 쓴다는 것 －해방기 북한 토지개혁과 『농민소설집』(1949) 시리즈를 중심으로
현대소설연구
2022 .06
-
唐 前期 安西四鎭의 設置와 變化樣相
동양사학연구
2017 .12
-
入唐 百濟 遺民과 그 후손들의 혼인과 가족 관계 - 高句麗 遺民과의 비교 -
목간과문자
2024 .12
-
야스퍼스의 실존적 상호소통에 기초한 난민문제에 대한 고찰
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
공항난민의 의사소통 문제와 언어 인권
사회언어학
2020 .01
-
난민과 국민: 『난민87』과 『어느 날 난민』의 서사를 중심으로
영미어문학
2024 .03
-
제주도민의 난민 인식
탐라문화
2021 .01
-
交河古城 內 佛塔에 관한 考察
문화사학
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-912-000663599