지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제115호
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 159 - 199 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.03.115.159
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Explored in this article is how Vice Commander(Bu-Weonsu) Kim Gyeong-seo, who joined the Shimha war only to be captured as a prisoner of war and later died in Hu-Geum, was commemorated posthumously, and why.
At the Shimhar war, many Joseon soldiers were either killed or captured. However, while the former were hailed as loyal victims and commemorated in the name of loyalty and dignity[忠節], the latter were condemned as traitors[逆節]. Case of Kim Gyeong-seo belonged to the latter, as he was criticized –along with Do-Weonsu(Supreme commander) Kang Hong-rib- just for the reason that he was captured. Compared to the ongoing praise of Kim Eung-ha who was known to have valiantly struggled and then got killed, the evaluation of Kim Gyeong-seo was quite harsh. Then, later the fact that Kim Gyeong-seo was actually killed by Hu-Geum was revealed and disclosed to the public, so his honor was reinstated along with his earlier position, and a new title was even bestowed posthumously. It seemed like his name was being finally cleared from that of a ‘surrenderer.’ Yet in reality, for quite some time, his reputation remained somewhat murky, between ‘loyal’ and ‘disloyal,’ as there was an opinion –supported by many- which believed while his case certainly merited a sympathetic reevaluation, the fact that he surrendered could not be ignored.
But in the latter half of the 18th century, the sense of obligation to ‘honor the true master race(in this case, the Chinese Ming dynasty)’ began to form rather dominantly, and a new effort to commemorate Kim Gyeong-seo was initiated. He was hailed as a “Loyal vassal,” and in the 19th century he was even cited as a symbol to propagate an agenda of the time, which was to ‘uphold a righteous cause,’ commemorating Ming.
In the process of his being reevaluated and newly honored, the evaluation of Gang Hong-rib, who was known to have surrendered to Hu-Geum with Kim, deteriorated. Gang’s surrender was defined as an act following former king Gwang’hae-gun’s secret order, and the Shimha battle was redefined as a battle that cost many lives in the name of honoring the true legitimate (Ming) dynasty. Such definitions were meant to strengthen Joseon’s new identity as the bearer of the Sino-centric traditions, while the dynasty itself was being forced to serve the ‘barbaric’ Qing.
At the Shimhar war, many Joseon soldiers were either killed or captured. However, while the former were hailed as loyal victims and commemorated in the name of loyalty and dignity[忠節], the latter were condemned as traitors[逆節]. Case of Kim Gyeong-seo belonged to the latter, as he was criticized –along with Do-Weonsu(Supreme commander) Kang Hong-rib- just for the reason that he was captured. Compared to the ongoing praise of Kim Eung-ha who was known to have valiantly struggled and then got killed, the evaluation of Kim Gyeong-seo was quite harsh. Then, later the fact that Kim Gyeong-seo was actually killed by Hu-Geum was revealed and disclosed to the public, so his honor was reinstated along with his earlier position, and a new title was even bestowed posthumously. It seemed like his name was being finally cleared from that of a ‘surrenderer.’ Yet in reality, for quite some time, his reputation remained somewhat murky, between ‘loyal’ and ‘disloyal,’ as there was an opinion –supported by many- which believed while his case certainly merited a sympathetic reevaluation, the fact that he surrendered could not be ignored.
But in the latter half of the 18th century, the sense of obligation to ‘honor the true master race(in this case, the Chinese Ming dynasty)’ began to form rather dominantly, and a new effort to commemorate Kim Gyeong-seo was initiated. He was hailed as a “Loyal vassal,” and in the 19th century he was even cited as a symbol to propagate an agenda of the time, which was to ‘uphold a righteous cause,’ commemorating Ming.
In the process of his being reevaluated and newly honored, the evaluation of Gang Hong-rib, who was known to have surrendered to Hu-Geum with Kim, deteriorated. Gang’s surrender was defined as an act following former king Gwang’hae-gun’s secret order, and the Shimha battle was redefined as a battle that cost many lives in the name of honoring the true legitimate (Ming) dynasty. Such definitions were meant to strengthen Joseon’s new identity as the bearer of the Sino-centric traditions, while the dynasty itself was being forced to serve the ‘barbaric’ Qing.
#대명의리
#존주대의
#중화계승의식
#현창
#김경서
#강홍립
#김응하
#심하전역
#양수투항
#도원수차패
#Loyalty to Ming
#Fulfilling Righteousness by Honoring the Master
#Consciousness to uphold the Chinese Cultural Essence
#commemoration
#Kim Gyeong-seo
#Gang Hong-rib
#Kim Eung-ha
#The Shim-river(“Shimha”) battle
#'Surrender of the Two Generals'
#seal of the Supreme Commander(Do-Weonsu Chapae)
목차
머리말
1. 김응하의 현창과 ‘양수투항’의 오명
2. 김경서의 신원과 ‘양수’에 대한 인식 변화
3. 김경서에 대한 현창과 존주대의의 표방
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『金將軍遺事』연구 - 김응하 『충렬록』과의 관계를 중심으로 -
열상고전연구
2019 .01
-
Liu Yi’s Surrender to the Ming and the Nature of Goryeo Missions to the Ming Dynasty
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2022 .06
-
김응하 충렬록(忠烈錄) 판본 변개 과정과 그 의미
유학연구
2019 .01
-
朝鮮王朝“三唐”詩人的宗唐詩風與元明詩學
열상고전연구
2015 .08
-
내촌(耐村) 강홍립(姜弘立)의 신원과 복권
열상고전연구
2019 .01
-
코퍼스 기반 현대중국어 유의어 ‘剛’, ‘剛剛’, ‘剛才’와 ‘了’의 공기(共現) 연구
중국어문학논집
2021 .08
-
五山禪僧의 對中國 집단학습활동을 통한 관련 지식 축적 및 인식 전파에 관한 연구(3)- 글로 배운 중국, 目睹한 중국 -
인문학연구
2024 .09
-
심하전투 전쟁포로 강홍립의 두 형상 -『책중일록』과 <강로전>의 대비를 중심으로 -
열상고전연구
2019 .01
-
To Remember the Ming: Eighteenth-Century Joseon Envoys and their Interpreters on the Ming-Qing Transition
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2022 .06
-
두 조선 사행의 외교 활동과 명의 대응 -1627년의 김상헌과 1637년의 김육-
대구사학
2022 .08
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
<임진록>의 강홍립 형상화와 작자의식 - 1차 정왜의 의미를 중심으로
어문론총
2024 .09
-
강화양명학 국제학술대회 분석을 통해본 하곡학 연구 현황과 전망
유학연구
2019 .01
-
조선 세종의 인사(人事) 실제 - 한어(漢語) 전문가 김하(金何)를 중심으로 -
역사와실학
2021 .08
-
1598년 조선 조정의 명군지휘부 접촉과 전쟁국면 調整
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
단원 김홍도 화제(畫題)의 서체와 낙관인
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
명 · 청 교체기 대명 사신과 거주민의 교류 - 최현의 『조천일록』을 중심으로 -
한국문학과 예술
2022 .09
-
임란시 상주 북천전투의 실상과 현창사업
역사교육논집
2017 .01
-
임진전쟁기 경주 안강 전투와 강화교섭 국면의 변동
한국사학보
2016 .02
-
조선후기 중화의식의 변용과 그 성격－조선중화의식의 실상에 대하여－
학림
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000500965