지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第119號
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 401 - 421 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2019.12.119.401
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Being known to nearly all Chinese people, stories of Wu Zixu involving his words & deeds are also pieces widely spreaded throughout the country. Pretending to be loyal to his foe, King of the State of Wu named Fuchai as a servantlike subordinate while along wacthing his own chance for a plan of revenge for his own motherland in defiance of dissuasions of his father, Wu has then become a controversial figure in the later generations while comments & disputes upon him as a historical personage have had never stopped. Representative works such as SHIJI & representative ideology of Neo-Confucianists for example the so-called Loyalty and Filial Piety had also intrigued scholars in Joseon on Wu Zixu, as above--mentioned, an important also controcersial figure in Chinese history.
In this paper, analyses from three aspects: breadth, depth and evaluation, of the acceptance of Wu Zixu by Joseon scholars are being made based upon 18 pieces of their proses collected by the author. Briefly, the process of the acceptance of Wu Zixu by scholars according to the research can be summarized as follows: Single Acceptance, Complex Acceptance and Typical Acceptance. The perspectives of concern on Wu Zixu by Joseon scholars are expanding continuously as the concerns have been gradually expanded from “dissuasive” and “whipping the corpse” to “resenting Fuchai”, “revenge” and “ignorance of his father’s dissuasions”. As the perspectives expand and dilate, the depth of the acceptance is no longer limited to its surface. Mainly around the contents “ignorance of his father’s dissuasions”, “revenge for his motherland”, scholars seted the scene, reeled silk from cocoons, polemic linked together and deepened layer up layer, while along, their evaluations of Wu Zixu can be summarized as follows: positive ones, also mixed or complete negative ones. Based upon the core ideology of Neo-Confucianism, the criteria of evaluations they drew，are applying 2 mostly adopted ones at that time as they’re the so-called “righteousness between sovereign and his ministers” and “righteousness in paternity”, while also as it’s known, that different values rendered different evaluations. In addition, Joseon scholars also showed their infinite pity for Wu Zixu in their works beyond their flat comments & evaluations upon this historical figure.
In this paper, analyses from three aspects: breadth, depth and evaluation, of the acceptance of Wu Zixu by Joseon scholars are being made based upon 18 pieces of their proses collected by the author. Briefly, the process of the acceptance of Wu Zixu by scholars according to the research can be summarized as follows: Single Acceptance, Complex Acceptance and Typical Acceptance. The perspectives of concern on Wu Zixu by Joseon scholars are expanding continuously as the concerns have been gradually expanded from “dissuasive” and “whipping the corpse” to “resenting Fuchai”, “revenge” and “ignorance of his father’s dissuasions”. As the perspectives expand and dilate, the depth of the acceptance is no longer limited to its surface. Mainly around the contents “ignorance of his father’s dissuasions”, “revenge for his motherland”, scholars seted the scene, reeled silk from cocoons, polemic linked together and deepened layer up layer, while along, their evaluations of Wu Zixu can be summarized as follows: positive ones, also mixed or complete negative ones. Based upon the core ideology of Neo-Confucianism, the criteria of evaluations they drew，are applying 2 mostly adopted ones at that time as they’re the so-called “righteousness between sovereign and his ministers” and “righteousness in paternity”, while also as it’s known, that different values rendered different evaluations. In addition, Joseon scholars also showed their infinite pity for Wu Zixu in their works beyond their flat comments & evaluations upon this historical figure.
목차
1. 緒論
2. 單一化接受：因襲諫臣形象
3. 複雜化接受：論點多樣，層層深入，褒貶不一
4. 典型化接受：全盤否定，過度解讀
5. 結論
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘伍子胥 이야기’의 계승과 변용－ ≪史記?伍子胥列傳≫을 중심으로 －
중국어문학
2021 .01
-
宋代文人之伍子胥人物品評小考
中國散文硏究集刊
2021 .12
-
南羲采《龟磵诗话》涉及李白诗歌字词和注释的条目解析
동아인문학
2018 .06
-
중국 학계의 문화한류 수용관점 추이 연구
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
范?故事在韓半島的傳播與接受
한중언어문화연구
2021 .01
-
中国知识界对文化韩流的解读与接受观点推移研究
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
祖紹楚騷高遠引, 越名任心自風流 - 論嵇康對屈原的接受與創新
국제언어문학
2019 .12
-
실존주의를 통한 인물의 주체성 이해와 문학 감상 교육 - <오월춘추>의 등장인물 ‘오자서’와 ‘범려’를 중심으로 -
문학교육학
2020 .01
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
童蒙須知의 庭訓的 성격과 조선조의 수용
동방한문학
2019 .01
-
高麗李齊賢漢文詞對唐宋詩詞的接受索隱(四川大學文學與新聞學院，中國成都，610064)
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .11
-
高丽文人对王维诗的接受
중국학
2015 .01
-
新發掘 朝鮮朝 『貞觀政要註解』의 編纂 經緯 및 體裁 考察
漢文敎育論集
2024 .06
-
“无A无B”与“没X没Y”的比较研究
중국언어연구
2022 .04
-
같지만 다른 王昭君 이야기?馬致遠의 《漢宮秋》와 尤?의 《弔琵琶》를 중심으로
중국문학
2020 .01
-
한국 문헌에 나타난 蘇武 관련 기록의 특징
철학논총
2015 .01
-
<<漢書ㆍ五行志>>를 통해 본 班固의 災異觀
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
「見られる」「見つめられる」「知られる」 「悟られる」が用いられている受身文について -動作主の性質を中心に-
일어일문학연구
2015 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-820-000344549