지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.2
- 수록면
- 1 - 188 (188page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background & Purpose of Research
The role that society requires of the livestock industry is becoming more complex and diverse than in the past. But different stakeholders" positions around the industry vary and social dialogue is not enough. Therefore, the livestock industry must accurately recognize and respond to the needs of society for sustainable development. To this end, it is necessary to figure out what is the social responsibility of the livestock industry and to organize the policies for carrying out the responsibilities.
Method of Research
This study reviewed past researches to summarize how Korea"s livestock policy and related laws have changed in response to changes in internal and external environments of the industry. A survey and IPA were conducted on consumers and producers to analyze the awareness and behavior of the livestock industry"s social responsibility. In addition, the study conducted a consumer analysis using a pro-social utility function to examine whether environmental conservation and animal welfare are significant buying factors.
Research Results and Implications
This study categorized the social responsibility of the livestock industry into four categories: civil responsibility, economic responsibility, ecological and environmental responsibility, and ethical responsibility. And the study summarized the policy tasks required to fulfill social responsibility.
This study defined the role of the livestock industry as "production and supply of safe livestock products by using a way that the people can accept," and thus defined the social responsibility of the industry as "to faith fully fulfill the social needs." In the role of the livestock industry, "an acceptable way" is defined as "the legal production process of livestock products with no negative externality, and further requiring the implementation of ethical acts such as animal welfare."
According to a survey of producers and consumers on social responsibility of the livestock industry, a difference in awareness between the two groups was confirmed. On strengthening social responsibility of the livestock industry, consumers put emphasis on toughening legal punishment when it comes to detecting illegal acts, while producers put the most importance on strengthening government policy support to root out livestock diseases and prevent environmental pollution. In relation to the fulfillment of the social responsibilities of the livestock industry, consumers value the awareness of the reality and voluntary improvement of the livestock industry, while producers believe that greater government policy support is the most important.
The consumer survey has shown that consumers have very low awareness of organic and animal welfare products. However, consumers with experience in purchasing certified products were clearly aware of the importance of the products and were willing to pay additional amounts. Nearly half of the producers in the survey are considering whether to participate in organic livestock or animal welfare certification programs, but are not easily involved due to rising managing costs and concerns about income.
The role that society requires of the livestock industry is becoming more complex and diverse than in the past. But different stakeholders" positions around the industry vary and social dialogue is not enough. Therefore, the livestock industry must accurately recognize and respond to the needs of society for sustainable development. To this end, it is necessary to figure out what is the social responsibility of the livestock industry and to organize the policies for carrying out the responsibilities.
Method of Research
This study reviewed past researches to summarize how Korea"s livestock policy and related laws have changed in response to changes in internal and external environments of the industry. A survey and IPA were conducted on consumers and producers to analyze the awareness and behavior of the livestock industry"s social responsibility. In addition, the study conducted a consumer analysis using a pro-social utility function to examine whether environmental conservation and animal welfare are significant buying factors.
Research Results and Implications
This study categorized the social responsibility of the livestock industry into four categories: civil responsibility, economic responsibility, ecological and environmental responsibility, and ethical responsibility. And the study summarized the policy tasks required to fulfill social responsibility.
This study defined the role of the livestock industry as "production and supply of safe livestock products by using a way that the people can accept," and thus defined the social responsibility of the industry as "to faith fully fulfill the social needs." In the role of the livestock industry, "an acceptable way" is defined as "the legal production process of livestock products with no negative externality, and further requiring the implementation of ethical acts such as animal welfare."
According to a survey of producers and consumers on social responsibility of the livestock industry, a difference in awareness between the two groups was confirmed. On strengthening social responsibility of the livestock industry, consumers put emphasis on toughening legal punishment when it comes to detecting illegal acts, while producers put the most importance on strengthening government policy support to root out livestock diseases and prevent environmental pollution. In relation to the fulfillment of the social responsibilities of the livestock industry, consumers value the awareness of the reality and voluntary improvement of the livestock industry, while producers believe that greater government policy support is the most important.
The consumer survey has shown that consumers have very low awareness of organic and animal welfare products. However, consumers with experience in purchasing certified products were clearly aware of the importance of the products and were willing to pay additional amounts. Nearly half of the producers in the survey are considering whether to participate in organic livestock or animal welfare certification programs, but are not easily involved due to rising managing costs and concerns about income.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 필요성
2. 연구 목적
3. 연구 범위와 주요 연구 내용
4. 선행연구 검토
[제2장 축산업의 사회적 책임 논의 배경과 개념]
1. 논의 배경
2. 관련 이론 검토
3. 개념 및 의의
[제3장 사회적 요구와 축산정책 변화]
1. 사회적 요구와 축산정책
2. 키워드 분석을 통한 축산업의 이슈 변화
3. 소결
[제4장 축산업의 사회적 책임에 대한 인식과 행태]
1. 조사 개요
2. 사회적 책임 인식
3. 행태 분석
4. 소결
[제5장 축산업의 사회적 책임 이행실태]
1. 사회적 책임 이행에 대한 소비자 및 생산자 평가
2. 사회적 책임 이행실태
3. 소결
[제6장 결론: 정책 방향과 과제]
1. 정책 과제 도출 배경
2. 사회적 책임 이행을 위한 정책 방향과 과제
[부록 1]
축산업 종사자의 법적 책임
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
축산업의 사회적 책임 이행 실태와 정책과제(2/2차년도)
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2019 .12
-
소비자의 대체축산식품 가치 인식과 구입 의향의 결정요인
식품유통연구
2024 .06
-
경기도 축사시설의 악취 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2016 .10
-
손실지출변경을 활용한 가축방역 사업의 재정효율성 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2020 .01
-
한우에 대한 축산물등급판정제도의 경제 효과 분석
식품유통연구
2017 .01
-
축산업 환경영향 분석과 정책과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2021 .10
-
한국 산업축산의 발전과정 : 구조적 생태문제의 세계사적 연원
환경사회학연구 ECO
2018 .12
-
말산업 분야에 대한 축산발전기금 활용 확대 방안 논의 : 축산법 및 한국마사회법 개정을 중심으로
농업경영.정책연구
2019 .01
-
계란 등급판정제도에 대한 경제적 효과 분석 연구
농업경영.정책연구
2021 .09
-
가축분뇨처리지원사업의 가축분뇨 자원화 효과 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2019 .01
-
대체육 구매의도의 영향요인에 관한 탐색적 연구: 축산업에 대한 부정적 인식을 중심으로
산업경제연구
2024 .08
-
사료정보 공개의 필요성에 관한 법적 고찰
인문사회 21
2022 .10
-
기후변화가 축산물 생산량에 미치는 영향 분석
정책개발연구
2020 .01
-
축산계열화사업 성과와 과제 : 육계산업을 중심으로
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2015 .02
-
친환경안전축산물직불제 사업의 성과 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2020 .01
-
가축사육 제한구역을 정한 조례의 효력을 다툰 판례의 동향과 시사점
환경법과 정책
2019 .09
-
우리나라 동물복지축산의 현황과 법적 과제
환경법과 정책
2017 .09
-
사회적 책임 관련 특성이 소비자의사결정에 미치는 영향
소비문화연구
2018 .01
-
Ten Years of Korea-U.S. FTA: focusing on agri-food trade
한국농촌경제연구원 농정포커스
2022 .06
-
축협사업과 축산농가소득의 연관성 분석
협동조합경영연구
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농축산업의 악취, 환경오염 문제 저감을 위한 정책 개선 방안
이명규
,
김두환
,
김기연
외 6명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2019
.12
한국 농어촌 마을의 변화 실태와 중장기 발전 방향(4/5차년도)
성주인
,
박시현
,
정문수
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2019
.02
“농외자본의 농업진출실태에 관한 일연구” : 축산업을 중심으로
박진도
경제논집
1991
.12
스마트 축산 농가 확산을 위한 돼지 사양관리 장치의 수집정보 표준화 동향에 관한 연구
노시영
,
이현동
,
홍영기
외 4명
한국통신학회논문지
2020
.08
안전한 축산단지 조성을 위한 축사 입지실태와 개선방안
양진홍
,
이미영
국토정책 Brief
2020
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-522-000265468