지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제114호
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 103 - 141 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.12.114.103
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Shijeon(市廛) has been considered to have been a premodern commercial entity which was destined to fade away after the country was opened up to the world with the opening of ports. Previous studies of this Shijeon usually concentrated on its close relationship with the government, and its privileges or function as a primary provider of materials required by the government. This may be due to the fact that most of the Shijeon-related records are generated by the union’s leadership [Dojung, 都中], and rather dominantly contain references to its businesses with the government. It should be remembered that all the individual shops that had spaces in Shijeon, which were called as ‘Bang(房)’ shops, were ultimately private merchants who pursued individual interests. And although the system and the organization of Shijeon was eventually dismantled, the individual members still existed outside of the Shijeon system. This prompts us to examine the Shijeon in the 19th century’s latter half through its inner dynamics and as an entity of its own. In this article, how the Shijeon"s organization was dismantled at the end of the 19th century will be examined of course, but not in terms of its relationship with the government, but rather in terms of actions of its own internal components, which was merchants.
As already mentioned in previous studies, the Shijeon organization was composed of Dojung(都中, union [leadership]) and Bang(房, operational entities). Records and documents that show us the operations of the ‘latter’ will be examined here. If we examine the case of Myeonju-jeon, the unit was dismantled in a certain order. First the respective Bang shops(Gakbang, 各房) left, then the Bibang(裨房, the community of ordinary members) community was broken up, and finally the Daebang(大房, the community of senior members) circle was dismantled. When it became clear that the Myeonju-jeon marketplace would no longer guarantee a certain level of profit, Jeob’bang members of individual shops left the Shijeon marketplace, and with the decrease in individual shops, the Myeonju-jeon itself began to experience difficulties in meeting its own obligations, such as performing dynastic duties, running its own organization, and securing needed amount of profits. The Dojung leadership of the Myeonju-jeon responded by increasing payments which should be given to the Jeob’ bang, or mobilizing more people, or even having senior members engage in active duties. Yet the exodus of Jeob’ bang members was unpreventable. After Bibang was abolished in 1905, only the Daebang was left to attend to the marketplace’s remaining financial tasks and mutual aid efforts.
So, we can see that the Shijeon’s downfall at the end of the 19th century was not a simple process. The Jeob’ bang members and the Dojung entity took different paths from each other.
As already mentioned in previous studies, the Shijeon organization was composed of Dojung(都中, union [leadership]) and Bang(房, operational entities). Records and documents that show us the operations of the ‘latter’ will be examined here. If we examine the case of Myeonju-jeon, the unit was dismantled in a certain order. First the respective Bang shops(Gakbang, 各房) left, then the Bibang(裨房, the community of ordinary members) community was broken up, and finally the Daebang(大房, the community of senior members) circle was dismantled. When it became clear that the Myeonju-jeon marketplace would no longer guarantee a certain level of profit, Jeob’bang members of individual shops left the Shijeon marketplace, and with the decrease in individual shops, the Myeonju-jeon itself began to experience difficulties in meeting its own obligations, such as performing dynastic duties, running its own organization, and securing needed amount of profits. The Dojung leadership of the Myeonju-jeon responded by increasing payments which should be given to the Jeob’ bang, or mobilizing more people, or even having senior members engage in active duties. Yet the exodus of Jeob’ bang members was unpreventable. After Bibang was abolished in 1905, only the Daebang was left to attend to the marketplace’s remaining financial tasks and mutual aid efforts.
So, we can see that the Shijeon’s downfall at the end of the 19th century was not a simple process. The Jeob’ bang members and the Dojung entity took different paths from each other.
목차
머리말
1. 접방인의 감소와 면주전의 위기
2. 도중의 대응
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려후기 必闍赤의 설치와 그 변화
사학연구
2018 .12
-
한국 궁중춤의 舞員 연구
온지논총
2017 .07
-
근대 도시 상하이의 주거 문제에 대하여 - 그 유래와 전개 양상을 중심으로 -
역사와 담론
2022 .10
-
민속학을 살다 : 민속학을 고민하는 젊은 민속학 연구자 동료들에게 - 島村孝則,『民俗学を生きる-ヴァナキュラ-研究への道』, 京都:晃洋書房, 2020 -
비교민속학
2020 .10
-
흥천사 대방(大房)의 건축적 특징
강좌 미술사
2021 .12
-
1829년 ‘七矣廛文書’를 통해 본 칠의전의 구성과 활동 : 조각난 사료의 퍼즐 맞추기
역사와경계
2018 .09
-
조선시대 한성부 所志 題辭에 기재된 千字文 字號와 六房의 업무 분담
장서각
2020 .04
-
4세기 후반 고구려-백제의 대방전쟁과 전시체제의 성립
역사와 담론
2023 .10
-
『삼국사기』에 나타난 대방국의 실체와 존재 양상
고조선단군학
2022 .04
-
帶方郡의 설치 의도와 長期 存續의 배경
고조선단군학
2022 .08
-
正祖의 세손시절 강론 문답 <春坊故事>에 대하여
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2020 .01
-
꽃집 상호의 업종부에 관한 국어학적 연구
어문론총
2018 .06
-
일본 이류각시담에 내포된 ‘경계’의 양상과 함의
일본문화연구
2024 .10
-
보세판매장 제도 개선 방안
인문사회과학연구
2019 .12
-
중국의 이원적 토지소유 구조 하의 소재산권 주택(小产权房) 문제 연구
중국지식네트워크
2018 .01
-
燕巖 朴趾源의 ｢象房｣과 ｢象記｣의 상호텍스트성 연구
동양한문학연구
2018 .01
-
패션 라이프스타일 숍의 체험마케팅 만족도가 구매 의도 및 충성도에 미치는 영향
복식문화연구
2019 .01
-
옮겨간 대방군과 남겨진 대방군
백산학보
2020 .01
-
고려 무신집권기 ‘復政于王’ 명분의 등장과 都房의 변화
민족문화연구
2022 .02
-
고려 후기 문신 유경(柳璥)의 정치활동 연구 - 유경과 무인집정·문신·국왕과의 정치적 관계를 중심으로 -
한국사연구
2021 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000225954