메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
기민석 (침신대)
저널정보
한국구약학회 구약논단 구약논단 제25권 제4호 통권74집
발행연도
2019.12
수록면
84 - 107 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study examines social arbitration mechanisms achieving the settlement of conflicts in a society to make peace, especially those attested in the literature of ancient Israel and its surrounding peoples. Even in ancient societies where primitive nature is abundant, they consciously struggled to preserve human rights and justice in their community. This spirit seems to be advanced to institutionalize a kind of ‘democratic’ decision-making process in the ‘council’ (assembly).
It was the elders who were responsible for the enactment of the council in ancient Israel, both in the cities and in the royal palace. In the former, they were managing conflicts, and, in the latter, advising for policy making. As for the former, the institution of the ‘city of refuge’ in the Old Testament is the best example as a witness to the conflict arbitration mechanism. It was the authority of the elders in the council that actually made the process of arbitration be carried out.
Usually discussion and counselling were initially made in a council by a number of members, and, afterward, the head of the council made an ultimate decision. Unlike today, decision by the majority was not what was commonly carried out to make a decision in the council. The reverence for the authority of the head of the council, therefore, was the key for arbitrating the conflicts of the society. Furthermore, the divine authority was employed to sort out more complicated and hardly solvable problems. The mechanism for it was the ‘casting lots,’ which was resorting to ‘chance.’ In the primitive and ancient world, however, ‘chance’ was not understood as an accidental happening but as an intervention of the divine will. In conclusion, it was the authority of the elders, which is of their tradition, and the divine will as well, which is of their religion, that could possibly facilitate the arbitrating and conciliating process to settle the conflicts of the ancient Israelite society.

목차

1. 공동체의 자구력(自救力), 인도주의적 흔적
2. 공동체의 자구력, 민주적 의결
3. 제비뽑기와 희생
4. 맺는 말
5. 참고문헌

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0