지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.7
- 수록면
- 1 - 195 (195page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to suggest effective tourism program focusing on mountain and river sightseeing tourism promoting regional economy for Gapyeong county in Gyeonggi-Do. As a metropolitan region, Gapyeong county have many attraction points for the tourists such as Petite France, Nami Island, Jarasum, etc. Clean Environment and circumstance is also good attraction factor for Gapyeong county.
However, Gapyeong is loosing the economic vitality in its regional economy, because its economy mainly depends on those traditional agriculture, food processing, pension and motel. According the Input-Output Analysis results, agriculture and food manufacturing industry showed dominant contribute to the region in production inducing effect, value-added inducing effect, and job creating effect. Thus, Gapyeong need new growth engine for the regional economic growth and for the future generation. Tourism industry will be the good alternative to substitute its traditional industry.
The survey results from the metropolitan and regional resident showed some necessary factors attracting tourists to stay longer periods, and those shopping, restaurant, transportation facilities should be improved for more convenience. Leisure sports, and eco tour city should be the new image for Gapyeong, so cable-car system, tram facility, mono-rail system, amphibious bus system could be introduced.
Feasibility analysis was conducted for those major suggested projects. Mono-rail system from Mt. Homyeong to Chungpyeong station showed 1.114 Benefit/Cost ratio, and so is acceptable project, but the lake Homyong-Gosungri line is not feasible in B/C. In terms of cable-car, the line from lake Homyong to Gosungri showed 1.048 Benefit/Cost ratio, but the mountain railroad train between Mt.Homyong and Chungpyeong station was not feasible and showed 0.408 benefit/cost ratio. Finally, the amphibious bus system through Gapyeong station to Chungpyeong station showed 1.34 B/C ratio and 17.2% IRR(Internal Rate of Return). In addition to these project, this research suggested some promotional projects, such as related development with Chungpyeong New Town Project, building the skywalk facility between Mt. Homyeong and lake Hoymyeong, opening Gapyeong Motor Cross competition, building the paragliding facilities at Mt. Homyeong, and luge testing courses.
Finally, private sector could be the reasonable project developer. The public sector could supply infrastructure to promote private investment considering its role in the local economy. As the Gapyeong mountain and water tourism development project, this study has analyzed the cost benefit for major projects considering profitability and profit and loss flow. It is necessary to judge more specific business cost and profit structure when the project is carried out specifically. Investment resources are based on private sector investment. However, the public sector could invest to raise the feasibility of the project by supporting infrastructure. Gapyeong is a backward region, so the Gyeonggi-Do can consider the role of public sector in terms of balanced development and activation of local economy.
However, Gapyeong is loosing the economic vitality in its regional economy, because its economy mainly depends on those traditional agriculture, food processing, pension and motel. According the Input-Output Analysis results, agriculture and food manufacturing industry showed dominant contribute to the region in production inducing effect, value-added inducing effect, and job creating effect. Thus, Gapyeong need new growth engine for the regional economic growth and for the future generation. Tourism industry will be the good alternative to substitute its traditional industry.
The survey results from the metropolitan and regional resident showed some necessary factors attracting tourists to stay longer periods, and those shopping, restaurant, transportation facilities should be improved for more convenience. Leisure sports, and eco tour city should be the new image for Gapyeong, so cable-car system, tram facility, mono-rail system, amphibious bus system could be introduced.
Feasibility analysis was conducted for those major suggested projects. Mono-rail system from Mt. Homyeong to Chungpyeong station showed 1.114 Benefit/Cost ratio, and so is acceptable project, but the lake Homyong-Gosungri line is not feasible in B/C. In terms of cable-car, the line from lake Homyong to Gosungri showed 1.048 Benefit/Cost ratio, but the mountain railroad train between Mt.Homyong and Chungpyeong station was not feasible and showed 0.408 benefit/cost ratio. Finally, the amphibious bus system through Gapyeong station to Chungpyeong station showed 1.34 B/C ratio and 17.2% IRR(Internal Rate of Return). In addition to these project, this research suggested some promotional projects, such as related development with Chungpyeong New Town Project, building the skywalk facility between Mt. Homyeong and lake Hoymyeong, opening Gapyeong Motor Cross competition, building the paragliding facilities at Mt. Homyeong, and luge testing courses.
Finally, private sector could be the reasonable project developer. The public sector could supply infrastructure to promote private investment considering its role in the local economy. As the Gapyeong mountain and water tourism development project, this study has analyzed the cost benefit for major projects considering profitability and profit and loss flow. It is necessary to judge more specific business cost and profit structure when the project is carried out specifically. Investment resources are based on private sector investment. However, the public sector could invest to raise the feasibility of the project by supporting infrastructure. Gapyeong is a backward region, so the Gyeonggi-Do can consider the role of public sector in terms of balanced development and activation of local economy.
목차
[표지]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구목적 및 필요성
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
3. 선행연구 검토
4. 연구 관련 쟁점
5. 주요 연구내용 및 추진계획
6. 기대효과
[제2장 가평군 관광자원 현황 및 특성]
1. 가평군 관광개발 여건
2. 가평군 산악 및 수상 관광자원 현황
3. 관광 트렌드 전망
[제3장 가평군 관광실태 조사]
1. 조사 개요
2. 설문조사 결과 분석
3. 가평 이미지 및 관광자원
4. 사업 타당성 및 정책방안
[제4장 가평군 산악 · 수상관광 개발방향]
1. 산악 관광교통의 개념
2. 국내외 산악관광 시설 도입 사례
3. 설문조사 시사점
[제5장 가평군 산악 · 수상관광 발전방안]
1. 산악관광시설 도입방안
2. 수륙양용버스 도입 방안
3. 기타 제안 사업
[제6장 결론 및 정책제안]
1. 사업추진 과제
2. 사업 타당성
3. 사업추진 체계 및 재원조달
4. 정책제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
가평군 스포츠 이벤트의 지역경제 파급효과와 발전 방안
정책연구
2020 .12
-
경기도내 인구소멸 위험지역 시·군 발전방안 연구 : 가평군을 사례로
정책연구
2021 .11
-
청소년 해양교육센터 건립 방안 연구
정책연구
2021 .09
-
경기북부 전략사업의 성과평가와 개선과제 연구
정책연구
2020 .08
-
경기도 맞춤형 생활환경 개선사업 지원 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .11
-
K.O.R.E.A. PROJECT
한국관광레저학회 학술발표대회
2017 .06
-
경기도 사회적경제 협업사업 성과 및 개선방안
정책연구
2021 .11
-
축제품질이 방문객의 기능적 가치와 감정적 가치에 미치는 영향관계 검증: 가평 세계커피페스티벌을 중심으로
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2020 .04
-
소비자 브랜드 관계 구축에 미치는 가평 잣 막걸리 아이덴티티의 효과에 관한 연구
사회과학연구
2021 .01
-
DB 품질개선사업의 대가 산정 모형연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2015 .01
-
가평군 공공도서관 중장기 종합발전계획 수립을 위한 인식조사 연구
한국문헌정보학회지
2024 .08
-
서울시 스마트시티 주요사업 실태와 발전방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2020 .06
-
농업생산기반정비사업 편익 산정 방법론에 관한 연구
농업경영.정책연구
2021 .12
-
지방재정투자사업의 타당성조사를 위한 적정 사회적 할인율에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2017 .12
-
6·25전쟁기 호주군의 참전 과정과 가평지구전투
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
Factors That Affect Project Time and Cost Performance during Highway Construction Using Incentive/Disincentive Provisions
토지주택연구
2020 .12
-
개인정보보호 관련 공공사업의 타당성 조사를 위한 비용효과분석 사례 연구
지식경영연구
2019 .01
-
자연보전권역 공동주택 규제 합리화에 관한 연구 -가평군을 포함한 자연보전권역 지역을 중심으로
도시정책연구
2018 .01
-
민간투자사업(Public-Private Partnership)의 원가구조와 사업수익률의 관계에 관한 연구
한국정책연구
2022 .12
-
뉴스데이터의 LDA 토픽 분석을 통한 장수군 농촌지역 활성화 사업의 특징- 관광·생활 키워드를 중심으로 -
농촌계획
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
자원봉사활동 지속과 중단요인 인식유형에 대한 Q방법론 연구 : 경북지역 자원봉사관리자를 대상으로
최유미
사회과학연구
2010
.06
여가스포츠 종목에 따른 AI(인공지능) 레벨 적용연구
김영재
한국여가레크리에이션학회지
2021
.09
승마장의 물리적 환경이 승마참여자의 만족에 미치는 영향
오석윤
,
민병조
관광레저연구
2017
.07
경기도 선형관광자원 활성화 및 관리방안
이수진
,
조응래
,
조성한
외 1명
정책연구
2017
.08
공공주도형 관광 e-Marketplace의 역할과 조건은 무엇인가? : 관광 e-Marketplace를 통한 국내관광 활성화 방안 심포지엄
박경열
한국관광정책
2011
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-309-001235524