지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제186집
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 111 - 162 (52page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2019.09.186.111
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Rebutted in this article is a prior determination (or estimation, based upon the style of letters carved on the surface of the monument) of the era during which the Cheongju Uncheon-dong Historical Monument of Temple was supposedly erected. Also included here is a new translation which would hopefully shed some light on really when it was erected and why.
This monument had earlier been considered as an important evidence to the existence of a specific historical notion (“All Three Hans are one [三韓一統意識]”) that presumably prevailed in 7th century Shilla. Yet it was recently confirmed that the monument was actually erected during the Goryeo period. Then, based upon the letter styles (which were argued to be including old Shilla and early Dang styles) a counter-argument resurfaced, claiming the monument was indeed erected in the 7th century as earlier believed. However, considering the fact that such styles were also used in early Goryeo days, the letter styles themselves should not be considered as a solid basis for such argument. Also, no other instances of erecting a monument have been found in periods earlier than the ending years of Shilla.
References to the Sugong(壽拱) Era’s second year document the foundation of the monastery itself, and the epitaph on the monument is about the monastery’s renovation, so they are as well far from being usable facts to support the “Erected in the 7th century” argument. The spacial perspective revealed in the epitaph also matches that of the Goryeo people, which viewed Goryeo as a center of its own universe, placed on the east side of China(“Haedong Cheon’ha, 海東天下”).
Meanwhile, the new translation also indicates this monument’s other nature as a Buddhist pagoda(僧塔). Buddhist pagodas only emerged at the end of the Shilla period. The king who sponsored the project seems to be “So(昭),” who was Goryeo’s 4th king Gwangjong(光宗). That puts the monument’s construction at some point during king Gwangjong’s reign. It seems that Gwangjong supported this project because Chungju was the home region of his mother’s house.
This monument had earlier been considered as an important evidence to the existence of a specific historical notion (“All Three Hans are one [三韓一統意識]”) that presumably prevailed in 7th century Shilla. Yet it was recently confirmed that the monument was actually erected during the Goryeo period. Then, based upon the letter styles (which were argued to be including old Shilla and early Dang styles) a counter-argument resurfaced, claiming the monument was indeed erected in the 7th century as earlier believed. However, considering the fact that such styles were also used in early Goryeo days, the letter styles themselves should not be considered as a solid basis for such argument. Also, no other instances of erecting a monument have been found in periods earlier than the ending years of Shilla.
References to the Sugong(壽拱) Era’s second year document the foundation of the monastery itself, and the epitaph on the monument is about the monastery’s renovation, so they are as well far from being usable facts to support the “Erected in the 7th century” argument. The spacial perspective revealed in the epitaph also matches that of the Goryeo people, which viewed Goryeo as a center of its own universe, placed on the east side of China(“Haedong Cheon’ha, 海東天下”).
Meanwhile, the new translation also indicates this monument’s other nature as a Buddhist pagoda(僧塔). Buddhist pagodas only emerged at the end of the Shilla period. The king who sponsored the project seems to be “So(昭),” who was Goryeo’s 4th king Gwangjong(光宗). That puts the monument’s construction at some point during king Gwangjong’s reign. It seems that Gwangjong supported this project because Chungju was the home region of his mother’s house.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 『운천동비』 의 서체(書體)와 입비 지역 검토
Ⅲ. 『운천동비』 의 내용과 건립 배경
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
하남 하사창동 천왕사지 철불좌상의 조성배경
민족문화연구
2023 .05
-
『청주운천동신라사적비』의 제작 연대 검토 : 서체와 주변 환경을 중심으로
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
운천동사적비의 역사 환경, 판독 교정
목간과문자
2023 .06
-
高麗 光宗의 개혁정치와 淸州 龍頭寺 鐵幢竿의 건립
사학연구
2016 .03
-
高麗 光宗의 侍衛軍 증강과 軍制改編
대구사학
2017 .01
-
고려 초 양천제의 형성 과정과 그 의미
사학연구
2024 .09
-
三韓의 용례와 그 인식
한국사연구
2016 .06
-
三韓一統意識의 성립 시기에 대한 재론 : 근거 자료에 대한 검토를 중심으로
한국사연구
2016 .12
-
일제강점기 초기 청주면의 근대도시적 공간형성 – 토지이용과 소유를 중심으로-
기전문화연구
2022 .12
-
高麗 光宗·景宗代 宋과의 교류
전북사학
2020 .01
-
瑞山 普願寺址 五層石塔의 初建 時期와 造成 背景
문화사학
2022 .12
-
루뱐카 광장의 기념비 건립 논쟁
슬라브학보
2022 .09
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 역사 교과서의 한국 고·중세사 서술 검토 -교육과정과의 연계성을 중심으로-
한국사학보
2020 .08
-
청주 집경시의 지역적 특성
어문논집
2020 .01
-
울진 봉평비의 ‘오(五)’자 논란에 대해
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
아직 해동 먼 날 어머니를 본다 외 4편
시조시학
2019 .09
-
문자기와를 통한 안성 봉업사의 성격 연구
백산학보
2018 .01
-
고구려 석비문화의 전개와 변천 : 비형(碑形)을 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .03
-
고려초 탄문의 불교계 활동과 보원사
사학연구
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-001238229