지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A historical appellation of Samhan is used to categorize southern part of Korean peninsula into three regions such as Mahan(馬韓) Jinhan(辰韓) Byŏnhan(弁韓). The period of Samhan was from BC 2<SUP>nd</SUP> to AD 3<SUP>rd</SUP> century before when these Hans-Mahan Jinhan Byŏnhanreplaced as Baekje, Silla, and Gaya respectively.
However, It engendered dissimilar history awareness from truth of Samhan since 6<SUP>th</SUP> century. For example, the history of Samhan has not been regarded as the history of southern part of Korean peninsula but that of the whole peninsula and eastern part of Liao-ho(遼河). Futhermore it is gradually used as the appellation to describe Three Kingdoms: Koguryo, Baekje, and Silla, because the expression of Samhan in China was used for indication of Eastern Barbarians located in eastern part of Liao-ho. The reasons why Chinese historians thought the part of Liao-ho and Korean peninsula as Samhan are that they thought as the related region to Gija Joseon(箕子朝鮮), and the descendant of Gija(箕子) according to its custom handed down Gija’s in their perception of history.
These sort of Chinese history awareness was transmitted to Silla’s historian. According to historical material of Silla, the term of Samhan emerged after the 7<SUP>th</SUP> century. Mostly historians in Silla used the term to present its unification and territories they conquered. However there was not one to one correspondence recognition between Samhan and Three kingdoms until the 9<SUP>th</SUP> century.
On the other hand, Three kingdoms in Korean peninsula was demonstrated as Samhan by ancient Japan since 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus the appellation of Samhan has historicity and universality to present Korean peninsula and other regions through the ancient East Asian history. According to this perspective, I think that Silla used the term of Samhan to emphasis their unified nation with its characteristic.
However, It engendered dissimilar history awareness from truth of Samhan since 6<SUP>th</SUP> century. For example, the history of Samhan has not been regarded as the history of southern part of Korean peninsula but that of the whole peninsula and eastern part of Liao-ho(遼河). Futhermore it is gradually used as the appellation to describe Three Kingdoms: Koguryo, Baekje, and Silla, because the expression of Samhan in China was used for indication of Eastern Barbarians located in eastern part of Liao-ho. The reasons why Chinese historians thought the part of Liao-ho and Korean peninsula as Samhan are that they thought as the related region to Gija Joseon(箕子朝鮮), and the descendant of Gija(箕子) according to its custom handed down Gija’s in their perception of history.
These sort of Chinese history awareness was transmitted to Silla’s historian. According to historical material of Silla, the term of Samhan emerged after the 7<SUP>th</SUP> century. Mostly historians in Silla used the term to present its unification and territories they conquered. However there was not one to one correspondence recognition between Samhan and Three kingdoms until the 9<SUP>th</SUP> century.
On the other hand, Three kingdoms in Korean peninsula was demonstrated as Samhan by ancient Japan since 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus the appellation of Samhan has historicity and universality to present Korean peninsula and other regions through the ancient East Asian history. According to this perspective, I think that Silla used the term of Samhan to emphasis their unified nation with its characteristic.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 고대 중국에서 쓰인 三韓의 용례
Ⅲ. 신라의 三韓호칭과 그 의미
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘일통삼한 의식’과 표상으로서의 ‘삼한’
역사비평
2019 .08
-
『조선왕조실록』에 나타난 三韓 개념에 대한 고찰
史叢(사총)
2020 .01
-
수ㆍ당대의 삼한 인식 변화와 『翰苑』의 편목 설정
선사와 고대
2021 .12
-
『청주운천동신라사적비』의 제작 연대 검토 : 서체와 주변 환경을 중심으로
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
삼한과 중국 군현의 의사교환 방식
백산학보
2024 .04
-
목은 이색(1328~1396)의 형세문화론적 화이관과 삼한사(三韓史) 인식
동방학지
2022 .12
-
신라의 후고구려 인식 -최치원의 당대 인식을 매개로-
한국고대사연구
2021 .09
-
궁예의 ‘(後)高麗’ 국호 제정과 ‘一統三韓’의 지향
신라사학보
2023 .12
-
운천동사적비의 역사 환경, 판독 교정
목간과문자
2023 .06
-
김춘추, 당 태종의 협약과 ‘일통삼한’
역사비평
2020 .05
-
삼한의 ‘祭天’과 동예 舞天의 포용성
백제문화
2020 .01
-
삼한과 그 식민지(왜: ‘불미국’, ‘야마국’) 그리고 ‘소도’ - 고조선과 삼한의 지도(‘부도문’) -
원불교사상과종교문화
2021 .09
-
삼한지역 출토 ‘주조제 철서(鐵鋤)’와 그 함의
한국상고사학보
2022 .11
-
신라의 ‘백제통합’과 ‘일통삼한’ 재론 : 최근의 사료 비판과 해석을 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2018 .03
-
신라의 ‘백제통합’과 ‘일통삼한’ 재론2 -핵심 사료의 쟁점과 해석을 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2019 .09
-
‘九韓’의 용례와 ‘韓’에 대한 인식
신라사학보
2016 .04
-
고대 동아시아의 삼한-삼국 계승의식의 정립 과정
역사와경계
2016 .06
-
唐 王朝에서 궁정정변을 일으키거나 평정하는 데 참여한 三韓人
동국사학
2023 .04
-
문헌을 통해 본 고대 부산의 대외교류
항도부산
2020 .01
-
新羅의 一統三國 지향과 報德國
한국고대사연구
2025 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-000865173