메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신창훈 (육군3사관학교)
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제124호
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
445 - 483 (39page)
DOI
10.35865/YWH.2022.06.124.445

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The name Kim Dae-jung resonated throughout the 20<SUP>th</SUP> century’s latter half, and still does now when we recollect on the period’s political history. There have been numerous historical evaluations, proportionate to his status in our history, that already came out. Previous studies, however, focused on highlighting his ideology and philosophy, when he was not actually a philosopher who only authored things in his life. He was a politician, with a long history associated with the institutionalized opposition party. So I think his journey in real life should take a more center stage in the historians’ evaluations of his accomplishments and deeds.
Examined in this article is his early activities in the 1960s, with a focus on his internal strength as well as external conditions that propelled him to political rise. Examination of the former reveals that the oppression from the junta ever since the May 16th military coup, and shortage of personnel in the opposition party, was what enabled Kim Dae-jung to grow as a person and a politician, while examination of the latter shows us he formed a new-style faction of his own, with the research center and also his closest secretaries.
Kim Dae-jung abolished some age-old political practices, by merging his own political faction with the modernization discourses that had been prevailing in the Korean society at the time. But he also did so at the cost of opposition party politics, immersing it even deeper into factionalism in the long run. He was able to embrace Western concepts and renew the appearance of Korean politics, but could not quite sever the ties with certain habits unique to the Korean society’s past. Hopefully this article would be able to suggest a way to reinterpret the history of the Korean opposition party in terms of political culture and modernity.

목차

머리말
1. 위기와 기회의 교차 : 민주당 신파와 김대중
2. “김대중계”의 성립 : 한국내외경제문제연구소와 비서진
3. 미완의 ‘근대화’ : 김대중계의 정치적 유산
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-911-001553913