메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
375 - 398 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In order to punish drunk driving pre-requisite is accurate measurement of blood alcohol concentration. As for method of measurement there are measurement with spirometer and collection of blood. When measurement through above mentioned method is difficult there is method of calculation by Widmark Equation. The Supreme Court recognized Widmark Equation as experiential evidence. And Supreme Court stated that strict proof is required for factors in need of its application and further abstractedly stated that factors which can influence blood alcohol concentration should be confirmed objectively and rationally with assistance of people with professional knowledge and experience. But in reality there were no such practise of proving rigorously or receiving assistance from people with professional knowledge or experience. In additional to such attitude of Supreme Court investigative agencies recognize level of increased value in blood alcohol concentration by means of back calculation and apply it as standard for punishment thus creating aggravated punishment for the drivers. Accordingly problems of its application by the Supreme Court it appears there is need for considerable limitation on Widmark Equation which is now used indiscriminately. In principle use of Widmark Equation should be prohibited and allowing its use exceptionally through appraisal by professionals will be a realistic solution for striking balance between need for Widmark Equation and basic principle of Criminal Proceedings Law professing for presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0