지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On February 5, 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt submitted a court reform plan, which was soon dubbed as court-packing plan, to the Congress. In the plan, Roosevelt revealed that he wanted to add 6 more justices to the Supreme Court of the United States and 44 new judges to other federal courts. If the bill had been passed in the Congress, the number of supreme court justices would have been 15. But the Congress turned down the bill and Roosevelt's scheme to reform the court ended in failure. Why did the President try to reform the Supreme Court and why did the Congress reject the bill? And what were the lessons we can learn through the Roosevelt's court packing plan?
Roosevelt wanted to remove the road blocks in his New Deal, reforming the conservative Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, consisted of 6 conservative justices and 3 liberal justices, declared the New Deal acts unconstitutional in several cases in 1935. Although the New Dealers including Roosevelt strongly criticized the Supreme Court, they could not have any measure to press the court. After the 1936 presidential election, however, Roosevelt seemed to believe that he had a mandate to reform the court. Right after he was sworn into his second term, Roosevelt wanted to inject "younger blood" into the Supreme Court.
However the Congress refused to pass the reform bill because it would twist American democratic system itself. The core principle of American democracy was found in separation of powers. The judicial review was the most essential power of the court to check the other two branches. If the judicial power had not been respected, American democracy would have deteriorated. Fortunately the Congress rejected the bill and the tradition of judicial review could remain intact.
Now a judicial reform is being widely discussed in Korea. Although the issue of Roosevelt's court packing plan was different from the current judicial reform issue in Korea, it can be a good example for us dealing with the judicial reform issue.
Roosevelt wanted to remove the road blocks in his New Deal, reforming the conservative Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, consisted of 6 conservative justices and 3 liberal justices, declared the New Deal acts unconstitutional in several cases in 1935. Although the New Dealers including Roosevelt strongly criticized the Supreme Court, they could not have any measure to press the court. After the 1936 presidential election, however, Roosevelt seemed to believe that he had a mandate to reform the court. Right after he was sworn into his second term, Roosevelt wanted to inject "younger blood" into the Supreme Court.
However the Congress refused to pass the reform bill because it would twist American democratic system itself. The core principle of American democracy was found in separation of powers. The judicial review was the most essential power of the court to check the other two branches. If the judicial power had not been respected, American democracy would have deteriorated. Fortunately the Congress rejected the bill and the tradition of judicial review could remain intact.
Now a judicial reform is being widely discussed in Korea. Although the issue of Roosevelt's court packing plan was different from the current judicial reform issue in Korea, it can be a good example for us dealing with the judicial reform issue.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 루즈벨트 사법개혁안의 배경
Ⅲ. 루즈벨트 사법개혁안의 향방
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
美國憲法上 司法權 關聯 規定의 構造와 內容
미국헌법연구
2005 .09
-
The Place Of The Supreme Court Of The United States In The American System
저스티스
1984 .10
-
사법서비스 공급자위원회의 한계 : 노무현 정부의 사법개혁에 대한 분석과 평가
공법학연구
2007 .05
-
룰라정부 사법개혁의 성과와 과제
중남미연구
2011 .10
-
형사절차에 있어서 치료적 사법의 도입에 관한 연구
한양법학
2014 .05
-
중국의 법원개혁과 사법독립 : 제 1, 2, 3차 〈법원개혁 요강〉 분석
국제정치논총
2011 .06
-
법관의 임용과 인사제도의 개혁방안
서강법학
2009 .06
-
中國法院의 管轄 : 행정소송법을 중심으로
행정법연구
2006 .10
-
항소법원 설치와 법관의 구성 및 전문화
강원법학
2009 .12
-
중국 최고인민법원의 사법해석제도 검토
공법학연구
2010 .08
-
Birth of the 38th Parallel under the Shadow of Roosevelt and Truman
아세아연구
1962 .11
-
미국연방대법원, 사법심사 그리고 국민
강원법학
2012 .06
-
美國의 聯邦租稅紛爭에 있어서의 法院의 選擇에 관한 考察
법학연구
2002 .12
-
중국 사법개혁 현황과 시사점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
Case Study in Judicial Activism of the European Court
유럽연구
1999 .12
-
最近(2016-2017) 美國 行政判例의 動向 및 分析 硏究
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
헌법재판소에 의한 사법적 정책결정(judicial policy making)의 배경과 한계 : 정당성과 능력문제를 중심으로
공법학연구
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018391017