지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are mainly three types of approaches to intervention effects in Korean wh-questions: pragmatic, semantic and syntactic. The present paper argues that despite problems presented by pragmatic and semantic accounts, a syntactic approach can explain the intervention effect in Korean wh-questions best because it can logically explain why Korean speakers make different grammatical judgment as far as the intervention effect is concerned and can predict the environment where no intervention effect is observed. Judgmental variability of the intervention effect and crosslinguistic varieties of interveners have been presented against syntactic accounts; however, the present paper claims that there are two superficially identical types of wh-questions in Korean, and due to the ambiguous status, grammatical judgment of the intervention effect can differ among speakers and may fluctuate within the same speaker more markedly than other syntactic phenomena, and also shows that the kind of interveners do not differ so much as has been claimed, and that interveners are contrastive-focused as Kim (2002a, b) argues.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
Barss, Andrew / 2000 / Step by Step / MIT Press :31~52
Beck, Sigrid / 1996 / Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement / Natural Language Semantics 4:1~56
Beck, Sigrid / 2006 / Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation / Natural Language Semantics 14:1~56
Beck, Sigrid / 2006 / Intervention Effects in Alternative Questions / J Comp German Linguist 9:165~208
Bruening, Benjamin / 2006 / Wh-Questions in Vietnamese / JEAL 15:319~341
Beck, Sigrid / 1996 / Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement / Natural Language Semantics 4:1~56
Beck, Sigrid / 2006 / Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation / Natural Language Semantics 14:1~56
Beck, Sigrid / 2006 / Intervention Effects in Alternative Questions / J Comp German Linguist 9:165~208
Bruening, Benjamin / 2006 / Wh-Questions in Vietnamese / JEAL 15:319~341
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Intervention effect, scope, and type-shifting
언어연구
2018 .01
-
On intervention effects in Korean
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .04
-
영어 이중목적어 구문의 삼층 구조 분석
영어학
2022 .01
-
현대중국어 ‘嗎’ 시비의문문의 경향성 해석과 응답 체계
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
Syntactic analysis on Information Structure
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2020 .10
-
More than Intervention Effects: Pragmatic Accounts of an Embedded why
인문사회과학연구
2023 .05
-
한국어 형용사의 의미 유형과 통사적 특성의 상관관계
언어학
2019 .04
-
《搜神记》“V杀(O)”、“V死(O)”结构研究
동아인문학
2024 .06
-
L2 Processing of Short-distance Wh-movement in Wh-questions: An fMRI Study
영어학연구
2022 .08
-
Intervention Effects and Specificity Effects in Wh-questions
어학연구
2017 .08
-
An experimental study on island effects related to“double relative clauses” in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
영어 통사적 이동의 신경상관물: 기능적 자기공명영상 연구
언어와언어학
2022 .08
-
Syntactic Competence of Heritage Speakers at Advanced Levels of Oral Proficiency: Evidence from L2 Korean
언어와 정보사회
2016 .03
-
Crossover and Intervention in Covert Syntax
언어과학연구
2018 .03
-
A Closer Look at L2 Students’ Syntactic Complexity and Teacher’s Revision: A Comparative Case Study
Studies in English Education
2020 .01
-
Cyclic Linearization and Edge Effect: A Comparative Analysis Using English and Korean
언어학
2023 .06
-
A dynamic case study on the development of syntactic complexity of second language learners’ written English
언어과학연구
2024 .09
-
Unraveling syntactic and semantic effects on structural priming: Evidence from Korean
언어
2019 .09
-
A Comparative Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in Teacher Revisions to L2 Student Compositions: An Exploratory Study
응용언어학
2019 .09
-
Genre-based Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in L2 College Students’ Writing: Pedagogic Scope and Directions
Journal of Asia TEFL
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0