메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제4권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
359 - 376 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper deals with the petition system, the grievance settlement system and the application for inspection in Board of Audit and Inspection Act in the respect of paternalism. It points out that the reason why those paternalistic systems exist is insufficient condition for us to practice the modern law system. It is necessary to adjust a new idea or system to one's own culture in accepting foreign culture. Accordingly it is not to be blamed that we have both Administrative Appeals Act and those paternalistic systems. On the contrary, we can run the risk that the social integration and legal order will be destroyed if a modern law system works without adjustment. But we can point out some problems in those paternalistic systems. First they cost us doubly. We should spend much national budget in operating those system. Second, it is the most important problem, their actions and the legal effects,generally, are not binding. And so, the possibility of settlement on the dispute often depends on the power of the head of a board. Consequently, it is limited to complementing the formal Administrative Appeals Act to use those paternalistic systems. If this principle is not kept and they play a leading role, it is difficult to establish the principle of the rule of the law in Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0