메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사학사학회 韓國史學史學報 韓國史學史學報 제21호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
111 - 148 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Fu Ssu-nian, who was one of the most famous historians of modern China, contributed to the scientization of Chinese historical research by transplanting the methodology of German positivism into China and thus made the historical science as an independent discipline in China. His remarkable research on Chinese archeology can also be considered as his important achievement. He cleared up the unsolved questions of the ancient Chinese history by unearthing Yinxu and constantly trained many leading archeologists. However his methodology had not any philosophical grounds for humanistic values because he excessively trusted the Western tradition of scientific positivism and adapted it to the Chinese history. He took no notice of fundamental principles of human beings and the world, essences of life, and moral values as well as the rules of historical change and development and its causal relations. It's a wrong opinion that Fu Ssu-nian transplanted the Ranke's positivism into China. Ranke would never try to expel philosophical ideas from history although it can be true that he considered historically positive materials as great important factors in his research. In fact, Ranke thought that the power of history depended on 'Ideas' or 'spiritual substances.’ Ranke's detailed and strict methodology cannot be considered as the final end of historical research but as an effort to find out the leading ideas of each historical stage. We can say that Ranke would not emphasize positivistic research exclusively but Fu Ssu-nian and a few modern Chinese historians would. China and its people were being threatened by the invasion of imperialism when Fu Ssu-nian worked in China. For this reason, his research and perception had a great tendency of nationalism. He was inclined to subordinate historical facts to his contemporary political and social problems. In terms of his national problems, he tried to disregarded his usual conviction that he had emphasized the scientific and positivistic research before. Such an aspect says that Dong-bei-shi-gang(『東北史綱』) is a groundless and failed historical research. By the same reason, it seems that the contemporary Chinese Northeast Project(東北工程) also depends on an illogical basis traced back to his failed theory. We can make sure that the attitude of many contemporary Chinese intellectuals towards Northeast Project and national problems is not different from Fu Ssu-nian's. We ought learn from his mistake that historical researches can be easily reduced into an useful instrument to political powers and make historians lose their academic pride as well as produce misunderstanding of history if they cannot keep a good distance from his contemporary political issues.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0