지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The protection of human rights is one of the main goals of modern society.
A. Similarities
1. Two people have a good tradition, a peace-loving tradition, which provides firm foundation for promotion and protection of people’s human rights. The peace results from respecting each other’s existence and human rights.
2. Thai people and Korean people have recently experienced “ political reform” and “Democratization of the country”, which led to prepare a new Constitution.
3. During the political reforms, human rights NGOs had played a very important role and largely participated in the process.
4. Two counties established national human rights institutions for the purpose of promoting and protecting human rights: “ National Human Rights Commission”
5. the National Human Rights Commissions are institutionally independent and composed of 11 members.
6. Two institutions have very similar powers in compliance with “Paris Principle”.
7. Regarding the objects for investigation, not only the actions of public institutions but also those of individuals are included.
B. Differences
1. Differences between two people's understanding about rights. Recently, the Korean people has begun to understand that, if they don’t insist on their rights, these will not be protected. According to the statistics of Korean NHRC, more than 80% of people’s complaints are normally rejected or dismissed. It means that Korean people are very positive about their rights.
2. The gap between the newly-acquired rights and the reality of power enforcement is different in two countries. As we know, either NHRC or human rights NGOs cannot work well without the force of public opinion.
3. Regarding Independence of NHRC, It is, in Thai, assured by the Constitution. The Thai Commission depends largely on the Senate, who elects 11 member of the Commission. But, it is practically the executive branch who has influence on the Commission by means of budget and manpower support. In Korea, the Independences of NHRC is assured by the NHRC Act. Three branches of the State participate quasi-equally in composition of the Commission. In reality, The Korean NHRC being supported by the Government in function, it is working without difficulties. On the contrary, the conflicts between former Thai Government and the Commission led the Commission in difficulties.
4. Regarding the conflicts with other institutions, it was, in Thai, the executive branch who was opposite to the Commission. But, in Korea, the conflicts resulted from some different interpretations on the people’s fundamental human rights. For example, the Commission considered the National Security Act as affecting human rights, which has been confirmed as consistent with the Constitution by the Constitutional Court. Even if the Commission could have a different opinion from the Constitutional Court’s, the Commission had to respect the Court’s ruling. According to the Constitution, the Constitutional Court is the last interpreter on the Constitution.
The protection of human rights is one of the main goals of modern society. A. Similarities 1. Two people have a good tradition, a peace-loving tradition, which provides firm foundation for promotion and protection of people’s human rights. The peace results from respecting each other’s existence and human rights. 2. Thai people and Korean people have recently experienced “ political reform” and “Democratization of the country”, which led to prepare a new Constitution. 3. During the political reforms, human rights NGOs had played a very important role and largely participated in the process. 4. Two counties established national human rights institutions for the purpose of promoting and protecting human rights: “ National Human Rights Commission” 5. the National Human Rights Commissions are institutionally independent and composed of 11 members. 6. Two institutions have very similar powers in compliance with “Paris Principle”. 7. Regarding the objects for investigation, not only the actions of public institutions but also those of individuals are included. B. Differences 1. Differences between two people's understanding about rights. Recently, the Korean people has begun to understand that, if they don’t insist on their rights, these will not be protected. According to the statistics of Korean NHRC, more than 80% of people’s complaints are normally rejected or dismissed. It means that Korean people are very positive about their rights. 2. The gap between the newly-acquired rights and the reality of power enforcement is different in two countries. As we know, either NHRC or human rights NGOs cannot work well without the force of public opinion. 3. Regarding Independence of NHRC, It is, in Thai, assured by the Constitution. The Thai Commission depends largely on the Senate, who elects 11 member of the Commission. But, it is practically the executive branch who has influence on the Commission by means of budget and manpower support. In Korea, the Independences of NHRC is assured by the NHRC Act. Three branches of the State participate quasi-equally in composition of the Commission. In reality, The Korean NHRC being supported by the Government in function, it is working without difficulties. On the contrary, the conflicts between former Thai Government and the Commission led the Commission in difficulties. 4. Regarding the conflicts with other institutions, it was, in Thai, the executive branch who was opposite to the Commission. But, in Korea, the conflicts resulted from some different interpretations on the people’s fundamental human rights. For example, the Commission considered the National Security Act as affecting human rights, which has been confirmed as consistent with the Constitution by the Constitutional Court. Even if the Commission could have a different opinion from the Constitutional Court’s, the Commission had to respect the Court’s ruling. According to the Constitution, the Constitutional Court is the last interpreter on the Constitution.
The protection of human rights is one of the main goals of modern society. A. Similarities 1. Two people have a good tradition, a peace-loving tradition, which provides firm foundation for promotion and protection of people’s human rights. The peace results from respecting each other’s existence and human rights. 2. Thai people and Korean people have recently experienced “ political reform” and “Democratization of the country”, which led to prepare a new Constitution. 3. During the political reforms, human rights NGOs had played a very important role and largely participated in the process. 4. Two counties established national human rights institutions for the purpose of promoting and protecting human rights: “ National Human Rights Commission” 5. the National Human Rights Commissions are institutionally independent and composed of 11 members. 6. Two institutions have very similar powers in compliance with “Paris Principle”. 7. Regarding the objects for investigation, not only the actions of public institutions but also those of individuals are included. B. Differences 1. Differences between two people's understanding about rights. Recently, the Korean people has begun to understand that, if they don’t insist on their rights, these will not be protected. According to the statistics of Korean NHRC, more than 80% of people’s complaints are normally rejected or dismissed. It means that Korean people are very positive about their rights. 2. The gap between the newly-acquired rights and the reality of power enforcement is different in two countries. As we know, either NHRC or human rights NGOs cannot work well without the force of public opinion. 3. Regarding Independence of NHRC, It is, in Thai, assured by the Constitution. The Thai Commission depends largely on the Senate, who elects 11 member of the Commission. But, it is practically the executive branch who has influence on the Commission by means of budget and manpower support. In Korea, the Independences of NHRC is assured by the NHRC Act. Three branches of the State participate quasi-equally in composition of the Commission. In reality, The Korean NHRC being supported by the Government in function, it is working without difficulties. On the contrary, the conflicts between former Thai Government and the Commission led the Commission in difficulties. 4. Regarding the conflicts with other institutions, it was, in Thai, the executive branch who was opposite to the Commission. But, in Korea, the conflicts resulted from some different interpretations on the people’s fundamental human rights. For example, the Commission considered the National Security Act as affecting human rights, which has been confirmed as consistent with the Constitution by the Constitutional Court. Even if the Commission could have a different opinion from the Constitutional Court’s, the Commission had to respect the Court’s ruling. According to the Constitution, the Constitutional Court is the last interpreter on the Constitution.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
/ 2002 / Rapport du Conseil Economique et Social, 『La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union EuropIJenne, son intIJgration dans un TraitIJ constitutionnel: Quelles implic
/ 2002 / 동아시아 인권의 새로운 탐색
/ 2005 / The Thai Constitution of 1997: A study on Protection Rights and Liberties : 483 ~ 493
/ 2005.02.28 / 태국의 민주화와 1997년 헌법개정 18집 : 1 ~ 26
/ 2006 / 동아시아의 인권상황과 국가인권기구의 역할
/ 2002 / 동아시아 인권의 새로운 탐색
/ 2005 / The Thai Constitution of 1997: A study on Protection Rights and Liberties : 483 ~ 493
/ 2005.02.28 / 태국의 민주화와 1997년 헌법개정 18집 : 1 ~ 26
/ 2006 / 동아시아의 인권상황과 국가인권기구의 역할
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국가인권위원회에 의한 인권보장과 과제
유럽헌법연구
2011 .01
-
인권의 국제적 실천성에 대한 연구
사회과학연구
2006 .02
-
국가인권위원회의 개혁방향
서강법률논총
2012 .08
-
(National human rights commission of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2019 .01
-
(National human rights commission of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2020 .01
-
(National human rights commission of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2018 .01
-
국내적 인권과 국제적 인권? : 인권 개념의 이중성에 대한 소고
한양법학
2011 .08
-
「국가인권위원회법」의 개정방향에 관한 연구
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
국가인권위원회 15년사
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2017 .01
-
Regional Human Rights Mechanism and the Alternatives for Asia
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
A Study on the Public Awareness Towards Children’s Rights to Live in Better Environments - Based on the Analysis of Decision Cases of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea
법학논총
2020 .05
-
아동⋅청소년인권 보호와 국가인권위원회 결정례 연구
法學論文集
2020 .01
-
인권사상의 현대적 전개
법학연구
2005 .12
-
한국사회의 민주주의와 인권보장 : 국가인권위원회를 중심으로
법학연구
2001 .12
-
(National human rights commission of the republic of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2010 .01
-
(National human rights commission of the republic of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2013 .01
-
(National human rights commission of the republic of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2014 .01
-
(National human rights commission of the republic of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2016 .01
-
(National human rights commission of the republic of korea) Annual report
[NHRC] 국가인권위원회 발간자료
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0