메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
연세대학교 언어정보연구원 (구 연세대학교 언어정보개발원) 언어사실과 관점 언어사실과 관점 제41권
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
5 - 47 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the learner's use of Korean language based on the Chinese Korean learner's corpus. For this purpose, we analyze the learner's corpus such as location of errors, error patterns and, error layers of form markers based on learner's written and spoken corpus. The results are as follows. First, when we analyze the use patterns of Chinese Korean learners by their proficiency and parts of speech, the use of pronouns and numerals is higher in most proficiency level than whole learner and the use of adverbs and exclamations is also noticeable. The usage pattern of the ending was lower in all the connection, pre-final endings transformation ending except the final endings, and the usage of all the postpositions except the nominative postposition is lower than the average proportion. In spoken language, we find that the usage rates of proper nouns, dependent nouns, pronouns, numerals, copula-ida, connective adverbs are relatively low, and the use of each part of speech varies greatly depending on the proficiency. The results of analyzing the error location in parts of speech show that the error rate in the functional words is higher than that of the real words and that the error occurrences are higher in the intermediate level in written language and the levels two and three in spoken language. Second, the results of the error pattern show that the Chinese learners are more likely to have a higher error rate of spelling error than the whole learners, and that there tend to be more missing errors in the beginner level and more substitution errors in the intermediate and advanced levels. Third, the results of the analysis of the linguistic error by proficiency show that the phonemic errors are most salient. Discourse errors are not significant due to insufficient data. In the written language, the error rate of the whole learner and the Chinese learner are different, but not large. Until the levels one through four, the error rates are higher for whole learners compared to Chinese learners, but they decrease gradually, and in the level five, the percentage of Chinese learners' errors is slightly increased. There is found little error in spoken language.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0