메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 과학기술법연구 과학기술법연구 제14권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
271 - 311 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
I think that science & technology is not unrelated with FTA. Because it pulls economic strength step as a result country’s science & technology shows big difference speed and result according to connection policy of these country. Because FTA is agreement that lower tariff or service wall between country or between fixed area, conclusion of the agreement is case that get into profit in the own country in fixed transaction, but there is the opposite case. From now on, we must discuss if is going to elaborate and supplement FTA policy and scientific technique policy how forward we advantage by the agreement than calculation of profit that FTA agreement gives to us. If the speed that FTA increases is fast, liberalization that international trade is perfect between the two countries by WTO’s surveillance and control forward may come true. This may apply WTO normally and do WTO and control of scientific technique policy between the FTA country and lively interchange and prosper technic finally. Scientific technique policy that the most country propels is enforced for two directions greatly. One enforces when develop fixed technology the country achieves some purpose of national defense or energy development etc., and another is thing to procure technic gradually and improve scientific technique competitive power. Because scientific technique policy that correspond to the latter here is thing to secure universality of technic, pointed end scientific technique flows as water flows to opponent through international trade. Therefore, each country is going to keep forefront in international market through scientific technique policy and protectionism of Intellectual Property rights. Recently, that FTA conclusion number is increasing worldwide this some measure reflect. The United States of America contracted FTA by Israel, the Canada and NAFTA’s order from the early 1980s to early 1990s, and South Africa area and FTA mainly in the 2000s. This countries are the country or area that preserve affinity by exchange relation as well as diplomacy and national defense exteriorly with the United States of America so far. The United States of America expresses will to preserve continuously affinity about diplomacy and national defense including this countries and international trade. While, the most country gains economical profit through international trade and think that purpose at the same time to prosper technic is biggest. Because most of these country is low remarkably competitive power of economy and technic than the United States of America. In the meantime, American scientific technique policy is emphasizing on practical side that expand share because do to reform technic. Therefore, logic that it expands market and is resource that develop state economy that American scientific technique policy does to reform technic is spread to foundation, its U.S. Government and corporation convinced FTA’s necessity and can speak that FTA is doing enough the function as fruit of technic in the United States of America at least finally. Japan is fermenting already or negotiate now contracting the southeast Asia countries and FTA mainly since 2001. Most of the southeast Asia country are thing which guarantor focuses in point to continue economic growth forward. Because cooperation system is constructed between junta and common people inquiry organization which government leading type scientific technique policy of Japan decides policy, direction of policy is been consistent. China is propeling countries and FTA that technic and economy do not develop yet such as South Africa’s part country, Middle East and Australia and New Zealand, Ireland including the southeast Asia country such as ASEAN from early 2002s. China considers all politics, diplomacy national security and economical side and consider national anthem that get into profit in own country by partner. By the way, though the South Korea selects FTA conclusion target soup, it no seem to be clear standard. Perhaps, know less than whether is selecting the most topical called economy development through international trade and plain standard. Specially, if examine the United States of America that is FTA’s partner being doing international trade with the South Korea, Japan, 4 country relation with China, the all 4 countries are Chile and Singapore and Australia in case select the same country by partner of FTA of the own country. For front, is FTA’s partner with these 3 country which is Korean main international transaction target nation, but think that there are much problems if consider case that these 3 departments and the many countries in FTA relation are no FTA relation with us. Because interchange of competitive power is activated about field that competitive power is high than us finally if daytime there will be much cases but FTA is contracted between two countries in several fields than FTA’s partner now, our competitive power is defined and competitive power daytime field that decrease be. This may not be different in scientific technique field. Therefore, I think that there is necessity to set FTA Guideline and backing Korean scientific technique policy.
#자유무역협정 #지역무역협정 #과학기술정책 #국제무역 #과학기술진흥 #FTA #Science & #amp # Technology Policy #WTO #RTA #World Economy

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청
?家陽一 / 2007 / 中?の??分析?FTAの積極活用で外資導入?から海外進出?へ?貌する中? / エコノミスト 85 (39) google schola Anne O. Krueger / 1995 / American Trade Policy: A Tragedy in the Making / American Enterprise Institute Press google schola Paul Krugman / 1996 / Pop Internationalism / Cambridge, MIT Press google schola Robert B. Zoellick / / Globalization, Trade and Economic Security google schola The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade / 2006 / 2006 Diplomatic White Paper google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0