메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제57호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
1 - 24 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to contribute to give an answer to the question raised in the controversy on the abolition of capital punishment in South Korea by introducing recent American law and economy theories on the subject. Arguments of the both sides of abolitionists and proponents of death penalty in Korea have been so far based on the so-called “legal emotion” and any scientific theory has never been contructed with a view to objectify the problem. In American academic society, economic approach to the impact of the capital punishment in the perspective of deterrent effect has a considerably long history since the article Isaac Ehrlich published in 1975. Many similar studies have been thereafter published to endorse the Ehrlich thesis. However, it is pointed out by John J. Donohue, III and Justin Wolfers in their very recent work (2009) that these studies show very crucial theoretical defects when they try to prove the deterrent effect of death penalty. By summarizing the history of econometric debate on the question,Donohue and Wolfers argue that OLS estimates studies show no statistically significant evidence of deterrence, which is contrary to what one easily expects from such studies. We can conclude therefore that from the econometric viewpoint, death penalty has no deterrent effect on homicide crimes.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0