메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제12권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
27 - 53 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The bases of criticism that the bad samaritan law which enforces to perform the duty to rescue in emergency situations by punishment is unacceptable by the reason of moralization of criminal law include the restriction of freedom of attitude by order, the clear-cut distinction of between law and moral, the ambiguity of positive duties etc. It is only decided between positive and passive duties whether the restriction of freedom is within the minimum or not. It is impossible to judge whether the restriction itself within the minimum or not, and impossible to judge by the discrimination between prohibition and order. Positive duty also could not excluded from legal duty even if positive duties is much more in the degree of restriction of freedom than passive duties and they usually belong to moral duty. Because such a restriction is fundamentally necessary for the existence of liberal society and the discrimination between law and moral changes according to time and society. Also against the criticism of the ambiguity of positive duty, for example, being the duty of solidarity restricted to accident cases or dangerous situations, the range of behavior discretion of each individual in the positive duty to rescue becomes narrow. The general duty to rescue of the bad Samaritan law is given to the one only who recognize an accident and is in a position to rescue the victim.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0