메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제12권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
541 - 562 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, the reaction of current criminal law against defamation and insult in internet and the debate of amendment to current law are reviewed. The main contents of this paper are summarized as following:First, for defamation and contempt done through internet the law of communications network Article 70 or the criminal law Article 307 can be applied, and for insulting on the internet the criminal law Article 311 can be applied so it is possible to say that there is no flaw in such laws for internet defamation or contempt. Second, the law of communications network Article 70 has to be absorbed by criminal law Article 309 because there is no need for additional punishment and a special Law against defamation in internet. In this case, the regulation which does not punish defendant according to victim's intent has to be subsisted and it is necessary to take a legislative action for justification. Third, it is not necessary to take a new legislative action against insult in internet. Because the theoretical basis for taking a new legislative action against insult in internet is weak and unconvincing. In it's final analysis, the reaction of current criminal law against defamation and insult in internet is sufficient. Therefore taking a new legislative action for additional punishment against insult in internet will only contribute to mass production of symbolic criminal law.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (58)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0