메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국세계지역학회 세계지역연구논총 세계지역연구논총 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
21 - 50 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to generate indicators of party system applicable to studies of measuring the party system, and to conceptualize party system properties with eight measures of party system, i.e., strength of the largest party, actual number of parties in parliament, fractionalization index by Rae, effective number of parties by Laakso and Taagepera, aggregation index by Mayer, volatility seat renovated from Pederson’s, strength of the second largest party and the strength of the third largest parties. For this study, we collected our own dataset which includes the percentage of parliamentary seats occupied by parties in 212 nations and used 187 nations for the analysis. We focused on changes of party system, and collected data on the distribution of party seats at two points in time: after a stimulus election prior to 2007 and after a referent election adjacent to the stimulus election. The very low correlations between percentages of seats held by parties #1 and #2, and #2 and #3, suggest that the success of the second largest party is largely independent of the third party’s success. The percentage of seats held by the second largest party in parliament offers itself as a good simple indicator of parliamentary party competition. Regarding volatility, there was virtually no correlation between the logged volatility seat score and the percentage of seats held by party #2 in the stimulus year. Volatility correlated slightly negatively with party #1 seats and slightly positively with party #3 seats. Our findings reconfirms that volatility is distinctly different dimension of party system properties. Our measure of party competition, the second largest and the volatility score tended to be unrelated to any of the other six indicators. Moreover, the factor analysis showed that six indicators, i.e., the strength of the largest party, actual number of parties in parliament, fractionalization, effective number of parties, aggregation index, and the strength of the third largest party, load on Factor 1, which could be named as party system fragmentation. The strength of the second largest party load on Factor 2, which could be named as “Party system competitiveness.” However, the volatility measure again did not correlate systematically and sufficiently with any of the other indicators. This confirms that we could use volatility for another independent indicator for measuring party system.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0