메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
385 - 412 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article, I have referred to recent developments and problem of outside director in Japan. After it was different from Japanese in case of and Korea,and an outside board system wasn't introduced compulsorily and corporate governance of a company was left to self-control of a company, transparency in management isn't secured more than Korea and USA. Therefore it's being argued to establish an outside board compulsorily to aim at a monitoring model of the true meaning. It's compared and examined to the respective institutional rational directions by the situation that the outside corporate auditor which has improved and has made them settle so far will be denied actually, and an effort is made in order to look for solution method to a problem while arguing by the operation reality in Japan. Reform of the board of directors of a listed company is a very important problem in a Japanese large-scale listed company also to reach a critical phase in a company legal system as well as a capital market law by Japan, develop international business and survive by global competition at present. To achieve a monitoring model of the true meaning, it doesn't stop at the argument of which an outside board and outside corporate auditor are required, and there are a lot of points that it's suggested in Korea for going to the way to require an independent director of the board of directors. 

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0