지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The outside director system has been put in force for 14 years in Korea, but many outside directors don"t properly control and monitor corporate management in Korea. To strengthen the monitoring functions of outside directors, the professionalism and Independence of outside directors should be secured in his inauguration and activity as a member of the board of directors. doubtlessly outside directors should be independent from CEO or majority shareholders, and they should be able to monitor the management in objective and fair position.
But in the corporates of Korea there are many problems which obstruct outside director"s strict supervision. Many outside directors have been selected under the influence of CEO or enter into connection with him on the their period of service in a position, so they couldn"t strictly investigate or monitor over the corporate management of CEO. Therefore in order to secure the monitoring function of the outside directors, it is desirable to enhance the professionalism and independence of outside directors.
So it is required to include corporate creditor and institutional investor or a representative of the minority shareholders in the committee for the outside director candidate recommendation, and to announce publicly the activities of outside directors to shareholders, and to be able to make minority shareholders and institutional investors to exercise their rights in shareholders" meeting.
But in the corporates of Korea there are many problems which obstruct outside director"s strict supervision. Many outside directors have been selected under the influence of CEO or enter into connection with him on the their period of service in a position, so they couldn"t strictly investigate or monitor over the corporate management of CEO. Therefore in order to secure the monitoring function of the outside directors, it is desirable to enhance the professionalism and independence of outside directors.
So it is required to include corporate creditor and institutional investor or a representative of the minority shareholders in the committee for the outside director candidate recommendation, and to announce publicly the activities of outside directors to shareholders, and to be able to make minority shareholders and institutional investors to exercise their rights in shareholders" meeting.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사외이사제도의 운영상 문제점
Ⅲ. 제도 개선의 필요성 및 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김정호 / 2010 / 이사회구성과 사외이사제도 / 상사법연구 29 (2) : 203 ~ 245
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철영 / 2011 / 의결권 행사의 전자화와 Shadow Voting / 상사법연구 29 (4) : 89 ~ 136
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 송종준 / 2011 / 회사법상 기업지배구조법제의 동향과 평가, 그리고 새로운 제언 / 상사판례연구 24 (1) : 3 ~ 41
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 안수현 / 2011 / 기업지배구조와 규제간의 상관성 모색 : 영국의 기업지배구조법제 변천에 기초하여 / 상사판례연구 24 (1) : 43 ~ 100
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오성근 / 2007 / 펀드의 의결권 행사와 펀드행동주의 - 외국의 사례를 통한 우리 제도의 현황과 개선방안을 중심으로- / 상장협연구 (55)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철영 / 2011 / 의결권 행사의 전자화와 Shadow Voting / 상사법연구 29 (4) : 89 ~ 136
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 송종준 / 2011 / 회사법상 기업지배구조법제의 동향과 평가, 그리고 새로운 제언 / 상사판례연구 24 (1) : 3 ~ 41
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 안수현 / 2011 / 기업지배구조와 규제간의 상관성 모색 : 영국의 기업지배구조법제 변천에 기초하여 / 상사판례연구 24 (1) : 43 ~ 100
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오성근 / 2007 / 펀드의 의결권 행사와 펀드행동주의 - 외국의 사례를 통한 우리 제도의 현황과 개선방안을 중심으로- / 상장협연구 (55)
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-366-000876753