메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제47권 제1호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
161 - 180 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to identify the social satirical elements in The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon and Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonneut. In this paper we can identify results as follows : In The Crying of Lot 49, social satire lies in the criticism of closed society. Oedipa realizes that genuine communication stems from understanding of the “Other”. She refuses to adopt only the formal communication. Journey to Narcisos ironically means an escape from narcissism. We can say that Pynchon reminds us of chances of escape from narcissism by using the term “trystero” as social metaphor. The satire in Slaughterhouse-Five attacks the notion of war as glorious, noble and just through a mixture of fact and fantasy. Vonnegut shows to us that a historical construct which has been regarded as an absolute truth is in fact a kind of arbitrary construct distorted by bad illusions. Bad illusions force man to overlook the common humanity. Billy’s trip to Tralfamadore serves to see time and death from a different perspective and to give them a better view of bad illusions. Such inversion of values leads man away from compassion and conscience toward greed and self-centeredness. In Slaughterhouse-Five Vonneget is making a powerful satirical statement about the kind of social attitudes responsible for war and its atrocities. As a conclusion, it can be said that social satire is dominant in American postmodern novels as many postmodern writers demonstrate.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0