지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In learning a foreign language, in particular, the dictionary plays an important role in self-directed learning. However, the study and publishing of Chinese dictionaries have been in place for a long time, and the Chinese dictionary now has a lot of problems in its organization and composition, and it limits the self-directed learning of learners. The evaluation and study of the dictionary are essential for improving the quality of Chinese dictionaries and for the efficiency of Chinese learning. However, there is still a lack of research on systematic dictionary evaluation models in Korea, making it difficult to conduct objective evaluations of Chinese dictionaries. Therefore, this study set the evaluation criteria and evaluation items to evaluate the overall microstructure of the dictionary used mainly by domestic Chinese learners and created specific evaluation items.
To evaluate a dictionary, it is necessary to identify the type of dictionary to be evaluated first. Provided that the type of dictionary is analyzed by using the dictionary classification method, the dictionary to study in this paper is a bilingual dictionary using Chinese and Korean, and a learners’ dictionary for Korean learners who are learning Chinese, and as an online dictionary using online media, this paper is called ‘Online Chinese learning dictionary’. Lexicographers have distinguished the structure of the dictionary from different perspectives, which in common include macrostructures and microstructures. In this paper, the discussion has been emphasized how the entries of the dictionary organize and provide information with a focus on its microstructure.
Although there is still insufficient research on the dictionary evaluation in Korea, Western and Chinese lexicographers have already studied criteria for evaluating various types of dictionaries. However, since existing evaluation criteria are insufficient in system and unsatisfactory to evaluate microstructure as a whole. it was necessary to establish the appropriate evaluation criteria to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learners’ dictionary. This paper refers to the evaluation criteria in the previous study and designed the criteria for the creation of evaluation items to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learning dictionary from a macro perspective based on the lexicography, Chinese Linguistics and evaluation theory. And based on these criteria, specific evaluation items has been created to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learners’ dictionary. First, five items have been created to evaluate the overall composition of the microstructure, and the vocabulary grade, spelling, pronunciation, semantic distribution, part of speech, definition of a word and example were set as essential information items of the microstructure, and 36 evaluation items have been created to evaluate them. The selection information items of the microstructure were made up of 18 evaluation items, divided into grammatical information, pragmatic information, reference words information, and other information.
The evaluation items created in this paper can actually be a standard for evaluating the online Chinese learning dictionary in Korea, and the dictionary researcher and lexicographers can refer to compiling and updating online Chinese learners’ dictionaries, and can also be used to evaluate and study other foreign language dictionaries.
To evaluate a dictionary, it is necessary to identify the type of dictionary to be evaluated first. Provided that the type of dictionary is analyzed by using the dictionary classification method, the dictionary to study in this paper is a bilingual dictionary using Chinese and Korean, and a learners’ dictionary for Korean learners who are learning Chinese, and as an online dictionary using online media, this paper is called ‘Online Chinese learning dictionary’. Lexicographers have distinguished the structure of the dictionary from different perspectives, which in common include macrostructures and microstructures. In this paper, the discussion has been emphasized how the entries of the dictionary organize and provide information with a focus on its microstructure.
Although there is still insufficient research on the dictionary evaluation in Korea, Western and Chinese lexicographers have already studied criteria for evaluating various types of dictionaries. However, since existing evaluation criteria are insufficient in system and unsatisfactory to evaluate microstructure as a whole. it was necessary to establish the appropriate evaluation criteria to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learners’ dictionary. This paper refers to the evaluation criteria in the previous study and designed the criteria for the creation of evaluation items to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learning dictionary from a macro perspective based on the lexicography, Chinese Linguistics and evaluation theory. And based on these criteria, specific evaluation items has been created to evaluate the microstructure of the online Chinese learners’ dictionary. First, five items have been created to evaluate the overall composition of the microstructure, and the vocabulary grade, spelling, pronunciation, semantic distribution, part of speech, definition of a word and example were set as essential information items of the microstructure, and 36 evaluation items have been created to evaluate them. The selection information items of the microstructure were made up of 18 evaluation items, divided into grammatical information, pragmatic information, reference words information, and other information.
The evaluation items created in this paper can actually be a standard for evaluating the online Chinese learning dictionary in Korea, and the dictionary researcher and lexicographers can refer to compiling and updating online Chinese learners’ dictionaries, and can also be used to evaluate and study other foreign language dictionaries.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 평가 대상과 평가 범위
3. 평가 기준
4. 평가 문항 제작
5. 나오는 말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
온라인 중국어 학습사전의 미시구조 평가 - 『네이버 중국어 사전』을 중심으로 -
중국어교육과연구
2019 .06
-
What Is a Good Microteaching to Pre-service English Teachers?: Self-evaluation According to Evaluation Types
신영어영문학
2021 .11
-
한국인 학습자를 위한 중국어 접속사의 등급 설계
중국어교육과연구
2020 .06
-
한중 학습사전의 미시 구조에 대한 고찰
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
한국어 온라인 성취도 평가 방안 연구
이중언어학
2022 .05
-
국어과 평가의 문제점과 체계화 방안 - 수행과 지필 평가의 균형적 접근을 중심으로
어문론집
2021 .03
-
비대면 온라인수업 과제 기반 평가방안 연구 -k대학 교양중국어 수업만족도 조사를 중심으로
외국학연구
2021 .09
-
국어사전의 화용 정보 현황에 대한 비판적 고찰
언어사실과 관점
2021 .01
-
어휘 평가 문항의 유형과 실제-대학수학능력시험 ‘한문’의 평가 문항을 중심으로-
漢字漢文敎育
2015 .01
-
대학 중국어 학습자의 학습동기와 태도에 관한 연구
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
중국어 학습동기 및 학습전략에 관한 연구 - 중국어 전공과 타전공 학습자의 비교를 중심으로
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
이러닝 중국어 학습자를 위한 진단평가 개발 연구
중국어문학논집
2019 .10
-
대학 중국어교육에서의 온라인 국제협력학습 기반 교수-학습 모형 설계
중국학
2023 .06
-
중국어 사전 사용 교육에 대한 연구 - 초급 중국어 학습자를 대상으로 -
중국언어연구
2022 .12
-
인터넷 기반 한국어 성취도 평가 개발을 위한 ICT 활용 방안 연구-온라인 세종학당 중급 성취도 평가를 중심으로-
이중언어학
2022 .05
-
인칭접미사 `-가, -자`의 중국어 대응 표현 연구
언어과학연구
2015 .06
-
鲁迅的遗言和Chinese Characteristics
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2015 .11
-
2022 개정 漢文科 敎育課程 ‘評價’의主眼點 및 特徵
漢文敎育論集
2023 .06
-
중국어 평가 문항 작성 기법 연구 : 신HSK, SNULT, FLEX 선택형 문항에 대한 비판적 분석을 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-703-000884590