메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
SAITO Akira (University of Tokyo)
저널정보
동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.29 No.1
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
11 - 27 (17page)
DOI
10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.1.11

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper deals with hitherto unresolved questions regarding the opening verse of Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (MMK) in Chapter 1 titled “Examination of Conditions.” In this well-known stanza Nāgārjuna negates the “arising” of things in the four possible ways: from themselves, from others, from both, or without cause (MMK 1.1). Despite a good number of studies so far executed, a few significant questions remain unresolved. In this regard, the present paper aims at reconsidering the following three points yet to be fully examined. The first point is whether Nāgārjuna presents only a conclusion in the above stanza (MMK 1.1) without showing any reasons for it in his discussion. The second concerns Bhāviveka’s criticism of Buddhapālita’s explanation of the above verse and whether it is logically valid or not. In relation to this question, the third and most important point is whether we have arrived at an accurate understanding of Candrakīrti’s discussion which vindicates Buddhapālita’s explanation with a methodological criticism of Bhāviveka. This paper mainly discusses the third point, with reference to the first two, when necessary.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
On the order Of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā 1.1–3
Buddhapālita-mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti on Mūlamadhyamakakārikā 1.1
Mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti-Prasannapadā (PSP) and Prajñāpradīpamūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti (PP) on Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (MMK) 1.1
On the negation of “[things’] arising from others,” Candrakīrti cites bothBuddhapālita’s explanation and Bhāviveka’s criticism of it as follows:
On the negation of “[things’] arising without cause,” Candrakīrti quotes bothBuddhapālita’s explanation and Bhāviveka’s criticism of it as follows:
Analysis of Bhāviveka and Candrakīrti’s Discussions
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-022-000923187