메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
전문잡지
저자정보
박종균 (부산장신대)
저널정보
한신대학교 한신신학연구소 신학연구 神學硏究 第73輯
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
341 - 368 (28page)
DOI
10.46334/TS.2018.12.73.341

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study attempts to characterize their eschatological thinking by analyzing the eschatological texts found in the writings of the successful Reformer Luther on the basis of secular authorities(obrigkeit), and of the Reformer Müntzer, who was labeled as a loser in the Reformation movement. Both have in common that they have applied eschatological viewpoints to historical events, but there are extreme differences and conflicts in their views on their social and political significance. This study discusses the Reformation of Luther and Müntzer from the point of view of eschatology, and clarifies the reason why the Reformation movement of both was forced to become uncompromising enemies in front of the political reality of revolution.
Luther’s political thought is faced with the criticism that Christians are urged to indulge in unjust social structures in the attitude of ‘defeatism’ and ‘quietism’. Luther chose oppression rather than revolution and also distinguished between personal morality and public morality as Christians. As demonstrated in the Peasant War, Luther emphasized the individual ethics of nonviolence and non-resistance to the violence of the oppressors, and gave the rulers of the secular authorities the public justification to use violent oppression to maintain the social order.
Political thought based on the eschatology of Müntzer played a prophetic role in shaping the structure of modern revolutionary thought. It means that the eschatological revolution of the Christianity in the latter half of the Middle Ages gave birth to contemporary radical political thought and theology. Given the implicit expectation, the sectarian tendency, the social critique, and the disturbance between dystopia and utopia, today`s leftwing political thought can be expressed as a secularized apocalyptic movement as well as a modern prophetic movement. Modern revolutionary ideas can not be identified with the religious apocalyptic ideas of the first or the sixteenth century, but they are implicit if they are viewed only in terms of their capacity to accommodate their political, religious, and existential experiences in different situations it will be possible.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 루터의 종말론
Ⅲ. 뮌처의 종말론
Ⅳ. 종교개혁과 혁명
Ⅴ. 나오면서
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-230-000527492