지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The period of the so-called “United Monarchy” became one of the most debated periods in biblical archaeology ever since Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues advocated “Low Chronology (LC).” The archaeological period Iron Age IIA was challenged to be considered as humble and poor, and accordingly the Judean kingdom in the period was denied. An archaeological challenge to “LC” advocators occurred from Khirbet Qeiyafa, which revealed a fortification system with two gates and a casemate city wall, epigraphic evidences, a pillared storage house, a government house, and a rich pottery assemblage, all dated to the early Iron Age IIA by the excavators. The advocators of “LC” accordingly negated their dating and re-dated it to the late Iron Age I.
This paper tries to reply to Singer-Avitz’s argument (2010, 2012, 2016) in seven points: (1) surface treatment; (2) krater; (3) base of storage jar; (4) black juglet; (5) Ashdod ware; (6) geographical analysis; (7) transitional period in archaeology. None of her arguments was not based on sound data and analysis. She seemed to try to fit archaeological results from Khirbet Qeiyafa to the main arguments of “LC.” 4.1% of bowls are hand-burnished on red slip; some krater types are continuous from the Iron Age I while the others newly appeared in the Iron Age IIA; Khirbet Qeiyafa revealed flat as well as round bases of storage jars; black juglets are mainly uncovered in the Iron Age IIA and later, while those found at Tel Beth Shemesh are attributed to Level 4 (1050-950 BCE), probably to last phase of the level; Ashdod ware was found together with the Philistine Bichrome in the Iron Age I sites in the Shephelah while Khirbet Qeiyafa revealed Ashdod ware without any Bichrome; in a comparative analysis with 1182 cases from 62 sites excavated in ten different regions, parallels are found from the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age IIB, and the most paralleled period is the Iron Age IIA.
All in all, Khirbet Qeiyafa, in which archaeological evidences for the establishment of the kingdom were uncovered, is reasonably dated to the early Iron Age IIA, which is attributed to the period of King David.
This paper tries to reply to Singer-Avitz’s argument (2010, 2012, 2016) in seven points: (1) surface treatment; (2) krater; (3) base of storage jar; (4) black juglet; (5) Ashdod ware; (6) geographical analysis; (7) transitional period in archaeology. None of her arguments was not based on sound data and analysis. She seemed to try to fit archaeological results from Khirbet Qeiyafa to the main arguments of “LC.” 4.1% of bowls are hand-burnished on red slip; some krater types are continuous from the Iron Age I while the others newly appeared in the Iron Age IIA; Khirbet Qeiyafa revealed flat as well as round bases of storage jars; black juglets are mainly uncovered in the Iron Age IIA and later, while those found at Tel Beth Shemesh are attributed to Level 4 (1050-950 BCE), probably to last phase of the level; Ashdod ware was found together with the Philistine Bichrome in the Iron Age I sites in the Shephelah while Khirbet Qeiyafa revealed Ashdod ware without any Bichrome; in a comparative analysis with 1182 cases from 62 sites excavated in ten different regions, parallels are found from the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age IIB, and the most paralleled period is the Iron Age IIA.
All in all, Khirbet Qeiyafa, in which archaeological evidences for the establishment of the kingdom were uncovered, is reasonably dated to the early Iron Age IIA, which is attributed to the period of King David.
목차
1. 서론
2. 히르벳 케야파의 토기 연대의 중요성
3. 징거-아비츠의 주장
4. 논의와 결론
5. 참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
燕下都의 造營과 都城 機能의 變遷
한국고고학보
2015 .01
-
유럽 鐵器時代 鐵 生産體制의 成立過程에 대한 硏究
호서고고학
2016 .01
-
기원전 11-10세기 고대 남부 레반트 베냐민과 유다 역사 재구성: 고고학 자료와 문헌 자료 재평가
구약논단
2025 .03
-
전북 동부지역 출토 철제무기의 전개양상과 의미 -남원·장수 삼국시대 분묘유적 출토품을 중심으로-
호남고고학보
2017 .01
-
호서지역 고려시대 철 및 철기의 생산 -다인철소(多仁鐵所)를 중심으로-
한국중세고고학
2023 .12
-
요령지역 철기문화의 전개와 한반도 초기철기문화
동북아역사논총
2017 .03
-
원삼국〜삼국시대 철제도검의 제작기술과 그 의미
고고광장
2019 .01
-
京畿南部 黃口池川流域의 靑銅器~初期鐵器時代 爭點
호서고고학
2017 .01
-
전남동부지역 초기철기∼원삼국시대 유적의 편년
사림
2017 .01
-
한반도 서남부지역 초기철기문화의 전개양상
전북사학
2015 .01
-
르호보암 시대의 도시계획과 함축된 의미 : 2017년 텔 라기스 발굴을 중심으로
구약논단
2017 .12
-
고구려의 鐵 유통에 대한 시론적 검토
고구려발해연구
2022 .07
-
초기철기시대 남한지역 흑색마연토기의 전개과정
호남고고학보
2017 .01
-
원주 학성동 철불의 流轉과 시대 인식
사림
2023 .04
-
중국 중원지역 주조철기의 등장과 발전
한국고고학보
2017 .01
-
가야지역의 철 생산과 유통 양상
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
청동기사회에서 철기사회로의 진행과정 — 집단지향적인 사회구조에서 개인지향적인 사회구조로의 변화과정과 이데올로기의 전환 —
사림
2019 .01
-
弁韓 ‘國出鐵’ 論의 檢證과 意味
고조선단군학
2018 .12
-
금속학적 분석을 통한 판상철부의제작기술 연구- 울산 하대고분 출토 유물을 중심으로 -
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0