지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.8
- 수록면
- 315 - 330 (16page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2018.08.29.3.315
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Preferential rules of origin aim to ensure that only goods produced by the parties to the FTA have the right to enjoy the benefits generated by the agreement and that the third parties cannot generate circumstances in which they benefit from the concession. Thus, in order to ensure that the FTA cannot grant any rights to non-member states, the preferential rules of origin system seeks for a purpose that is distinct from the non-preferential rules of origin system.
In addition, the main scope of non-preferential rules of origin is to distinguish goods subject to trade restrictions through goods subject to the MFN treatment set out in Article 1 of GATT, whereas the focus of preferential rules of origin is that the preferential trade agreement does not grant specific rights or impose specific obligation to the third parties.
As such, it is natural to assume that preferential rules of origin and non-preferential rules of origin can`t be harmonized with each other. `Common Declaration with Regard to Preferential Rules of Origin`, which constitutes Annex II to `the Agreement on Rules of Origin`, is not legally binding. However, provisions of the declaration may affect the interpretation of binding regulations under WTO agreements, such as art. 24 of GATT, concerning the rules of origin included in preferential trade agreements. In that the declaration reflects commitment among WTO members on appropriate standards of conduct, the rules of the declaration can be some kind of pressure on member states to match the action standards on it.
The FTA system is based on the idea that all agreements are equal and exist independently of each other. This, however, requires all member states to recognize the territorial scope of other member states in implementing a set of common rules of origin and should be based on cooperation between various tariff authorities based on transparency.
Although the related provisions of the WTO system are insufficient and the aspects of the regulation are very simple, it is not too doubtful that the multilateral international trade norms represented by the WTO agreements will apply to preferential rules of origin. If, on a macro level, symbolical regulations such as `Common Declaration with Regard to Preferential Rules of Origin` can be interpreted significantly and a general international trade norm, such as the principle of transparency, can be applied to preferential rules of origin, other norms can be applied step by step, thereby seeking harmony between the preferential and non-preferential rules of origin.
In addition, the main scope of non-preferential rules of origin is to distinguish goods subject to trade restrictions through goods subject to the MFN treatment set out in Article 1 of GATT, whereas the focus of preferential rules of origin is that the preferential trade agreement does not grant specific rights or impose specific obligation to the third parties.
As such, it is natural to assume that preferential rules of origin and non-preferential rules of origin can`t be harmonized with each other. `Common Declaration with Regard to Preferential Rules of Origin`, which constitutes Annex II to `the Agreement on Rules of Origin`, is not legally binding. However, provisions of the declaration may affect the interpretation of binding regulations under WTO agreements, such as art. 24 of GATT, concerning the rules of origin included in preferential trade agreements. In that the declaration reflects commitment among WTO members on appropriate standards of conduct, the rules of the declaration can be some kind of pressure on member states to match the action standards on it.
The FTA system is based on the idea that all agreements are equal and exist independently of each other. This, however, requires all member states to recognize the territorial scope of other member states in implementing a set of common rules of origin and should be based on cooperation between various tariff authorities based on transparency.
Although the related provisions of the WTO system are insufficient and the aspects of the regulation are very simple, it is not too doubtful that the multilateral international trade norms represented by the WTO agreements will apply to preferential rules of origin. If, on a macro level, symbolical regulations such as `Common Declaration with Regard to Preferential Rules of Origin` can be interpreted significantly and a general international trade norm, such as the principle of transparency, can be applied to preferential rules of origin, other norms can be applied step by step, thereby seeking harmony between the preferential and non-preferential rules of origin.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 특혜원산지규정의 성격과 구성 요건
Ⅲ. 다자무역체계와 특혜무역체계에서의 원산지규정
Ⅳ. 특혜원산지규정에 대한 다자간 국제통상규범의 적용 가능성
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Effects of Preferential Rules of Origin on Korean Supply Chains
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2021 .10
-
무역원활화를 위한 비특혜원산지제도 발전방안에 대한 연구 : 원산지판정(결정)기준을 중심으로
관세학회지
2021 .05
-
특혜원산지규정 간소화에 대한 사례연구 : 직접운송원칙의 개선을 중심으로
관세학회지
2016 .05
-
개정 국제사법상 소비자계약의 특칙에 관한 연구 - 개정법 제42조와 제47조의 문언에 기초한 해석론을중심으로 -
국제사법연구
2022 .06
-
디지털 무역상 원산지에 관한 연구
법학논집
2020 .01
-
수산물의 한ㆍ중 FTA 원산지규정에 관한 연구: 특혜관세적용의 쟁점사항을 중심으로
해양비즈니스
2018 .01
-
FTA 특혜원산지규정이 한국의 중간재 무역에 미치는 영향
연구보고서
2020 .12
-
비특혜원산지증명서 제도의 발전방안에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2015 .08
-
FTA 원산지 규정(Rules of Origin)이 농식품수출에 미치는 효과 - 분위수 회귀분석방법을 중심으로
농업경제연구
2016 .01
-
미국 특혜원산지 규정 해석에 대한 연구 : 국제무역재판소 판례를 중심으로
관세학회지
2016 .02
-
한ㆍ중 FTA 원산지규정에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2016 .02
-
자원기반관점(RBV)의 원산지관리역량이 FTA 수출성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구
통상정보연구
2018 .03
-
자유무역협정의 원산지규정 적용배제 사례와 개선방안에 대한 연구
관세학회지
2019 .08
-
A Study on the Dispute Settlement Procedure for the Preferential Rules of Origin
중재연구
2016 .01
-
한·중 FTA와 旣체결 주요 FTA의 원산지 규정과 절차 비교연구 : 미국 · EU · ASEAN FTA 중심으로
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
우리나라 원산지제도의 법령 및 운영체계 효율화 방안: 원산지법(가칭) 제정을 중심으로
무역연구
2015 .01
-
한국 FTA 원산지규정 분쟁사례 연구
통상정보연구
2018 .09
-
RCEP의 원산지 규정의 특성과 적용
무역연구
2023 .04
-
국제물품매매계약과 FTA원산지관리의 관계 연구 - 원산지증명과 해상직접운송 서류를 중심으로 -
해양비즈니스
2019 .01
-
원산지규정의 불확실성이 기업의 수출성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석
국제상학
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0