지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국중어중문학회 중어중문학 中語中文學 第72輯
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 73 - 93 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.46612/kjcll.2018.06.72.73
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article will give an account of Lee Deokmoo’s (李德懋) “Chong jang kwan Jeonseo · Yang Yeop ki 4 · Ye Go Jeong(靑莊館全書·盎葉記四·隷古定)”, to explore the terminology of Lee‘s Li Gu Ding(隸古定). Lee Deokmoo(1741-1793) was a scholar of the Joseon Dynasty and a member of Northem School(北學派)]. In 1778, he gained the opportunity to become a Shu Zhuang guan and contacted the academics of the Qing Dynasty. He has achieved certain achievements in primary school, essay writing, painting, etc., especially a scholar with a keen interest in linguistics.
The “Li Gu Ding” is generally considered to replace the ancient chracter (古體) with the Li ti chracter(隸體) , and then to extend this idea, to replace the ancient font with tthe chracter.
Li Guwen first appeared in Han(漢) Kong Anguo’s “Book of Preface(孔安國《尚書·序》)” and continued discussions on Tang(唐) Yanshi’s ancient books on “Kuang Miu Zheng Su(顏師古《匡謬正俗》)” and Lu Deming’s “Elegant Interpretation, Preface, and Notes(陸德明《經典釋文·序錄·注解》)” and other articles. After discussion, the basic concept of the established ancient text was gradually formed.
In the middle of the 18th century, Joseon(朝鮮) Lee Deokmoo discussed the meaning of the term “Li Gu Ding(隷古定)” in the article “Li Gu Ding(Ye Go Jeong:隷古定)”. Lee Deokmoo quoted Ming Dynasty(明) Zhang Chao (張潮)’s “Gu Li Gu Ding” as the “Li Gu Zi” proposition. He also cited the opinions of three Zhang, That is to say Zhang Chao(張潮), Zhang Yin (張縯) of Southern Song(南宋)and Joseon(朝鮮) Zhang Wei. Lee explained: “The word ‘set(定)’ is used as the word ‘character(字)’. Although it is not plausible, it means quite understandable.”
This article through the analysis of the three-word speech and Lee Deokmoo’s point of view, found that even though Lee’s knowledge of Yan Shigu and other discussions about the “Li Gu Ding” still put forward Zhang Chao and other viewpoints, it has certain significance. “Li Gu Ding” was originally called “Li Ding Gu Wen”. In terms of the typeface, the “set” and “character” of the book “Qi Ding Gu Wen” are similar. The Tang Yan Shi Gu attached great importance to its “Ding Ding”, so it was Joseon(朝鮮) In the 18th century, there were some people who misunderstood the term “Li Gu Ding” to mean “not to be from the ancient Kodou(科斗古文)”. Therefore, Lee believes that if the word “character(字)” is used as “scribecal ancient character(隸古字)”, it may make the reader easy to use. we can understand the meaning of “decide a ancient texts as a scribe written in classical hand texts (隷定古文)” that combines the two type ancient chracter(隷古兩體).
Through the analysis of the article “Li Gu Ding”, this paper consider that Lee Deokmoo admires Sinology and inherits the tendency Joseon(朝鮮) academics. Lee sigh lamented that he could not co-exist with Li(隷) and Gu(古) two characters. He can see that he admired the academic attitude of the Han Dynasty. The proposal made by Zhang Wei and other Joseon(朝鮮) scholars can be seen as an effort to promote the Joseon(朝鮮) academics.
The “Li Gu Ding” is generally considered to replace the ancient chracter (古體) with the Li ti chracter(隸體) , and then to extend this idea, to replace the ancient font with tthe chracter.
Li Guwen first appeared in Han(漢) Kong Anguo’s “Book of Preface(孔安國《尚書·序》)” and continued discussions on Tang(唐) Yanshi’s ancient books on “Kuang Miu Zheng Su(顏師古《匡謬正俗》)” and Lu Deming’s “Elegant Interpretation, Preface, and Notes(陸德明《經典釋文·序錄·注解》)” and other articles. After discussion, the basic concept of the established ancient text was gradually formed.
In the middle of the 18th century, Joseon(朝鮮) Lee Deokmoo discussed the meaning of the term “Li Gu Ding(隷古定)” in the article “Li Gu Ding(Ye Go Jeong:隷古定)”. Lee Deokmoo quoted Ming Dynasty(明) Zhang Chao (張潮)’s “Gu Li Gu Ding” as the “Li Gu Zi” proposition. He also cited the opinions of three Zhang, That is to say Zhang Chao(張潮), Zhang Yin (張縯) of Southern Song(南宋)and Joseon(朝鮮) Zhang Wei. Lee explained: “The word ‘set(定)’ is used as the word ‘character(字)’. Although it is not plausible, it means quite understandable.”
This article through the analysis of the three-word speech and Lee Deokmoo’s point of view, found that even though Lee’s knowledge of Yan Shigu and other discussions about the “Li Gu Ding” still put forward Zhang Chao and other viewpoints, it has certain significance. “Li Gu Ding” was originally called “Li Ding Gu Wen”. In terms of the typeface, the “set” and “character” of the book “Qi Ding Gu Wen” are similar. The Tang Yan Shi Gu attached great importance to its “Ding Ding”, so it was Joseon(朝鮮) In the 18th century, there were some people who misunderstood the term “Li Gu Ding” to mean “not to be from the ancient Kodou(科斗古文)”. Therefore, Lee believes that if the word “character(字)” is used as “scribecal ancient character(隸古字)”, it may make the reader easy to use. we can understand the meaning of “decide a ancient texts as a scribe written in classical hand texts (隷定古文)” that combines the two type ancient chracter(隷古兩體).
Through the analysis of the article “Li Gu Ding”, this paper consider that Lee Deokmoo admires Sinology and inherits the tendency Joseon(朝鮮) academics. Lee sigh lamented that he could not co-exist with Li(隷) and Gu(古) two characters. He can see that he admired the academic attitude of the Han Dynasty. The proposal made by Zhang Wei and other Joseon(朝鮮) scholars can be seen as an effort to promote the Joseon(朝鮮) academics.
목차
1. 前言
2. 李德懋的文字观
3. 李德懋的「隶古定」
4. 结语
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
李德懋 「隷古定」에 관한 몇 가지 토론
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
조선초기 대일외교관 이예의 연구 현황과 과제
한일관계사연구
2023 .08
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
도선(道詵)의 예언서와 정경(鄭經), 그리고 정진인
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
李冶와 그 詩에 대한 중국 문인의 인식과 평가
동양학
2020 .01
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
일제강점기 대만 지식인에게 비친 조선
중어중문학
2018 .09
-
조선 전기 패설 연구의 성과와 방향
동방한문학
2019 .01
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
Korea Journal
2023 .12
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
김석범의 『만월(満月)』론 -제주4·3, 그 후로부터 50년-
일본문화학보
2022 .08
-
1910~20년대 식민지 조선에서 개최된 공진회와 박람회의 성격
전북사학
2018 .01
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
조선초 정도전의 공적과 과오 규정
역사와현실
2021 .12
-
1910~20년대 일본인 저작의 조선 의생활(衣生活) 항목 비교 : 이마무라 도모(今村鞆) · 니시무라 신타로(西村眞太郞) · 마츠다 코(松田甲)의 기록을 중심으로
민속학연구
2016 .12
-
1920년대 문화사학자의 민족 자각론과 한국상고사 인식
역사와 담론
2023 .04
-
1930년대 조선학 운동가들의 ‘실’담론과 ‘실학’개념의 형성 I - 정인보의 ‘조선학’과 ‘실사구시의 학’을 중심으로 -
양명학
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-820-003164408